Search for: "United States v. Mark"
Results 9221 - 9240
of 10,395
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jul 2009, 4:42 am
., ;07 CV 8473 (GBD); UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK;2009 U.S. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 9:41 pm
One might justify what the Court did in Marschalk as stemming from the same pressures that led to the quick and decisive resolution of the Iranian claims isssue that prompted Dames & Moore itself, but in the typical case, a "GVR" in light of the new decision seems right on.Same, too, with the most recent well-known effort by a court of appeals to have the Supreme Court answer a certified question -- the en banc Second Circuit's 2005 certificate in… [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 9:10 pm
Attorney General's Office in the Superior Court, rather than by the United States Attorney's Office at the United States District Court. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 8:45 pm
United States, 909 F.2d 495, 499 (Fed. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 4:16 am
Colo. 2008) (alleged "direct violation of the Code of Federal Regulations" too general to state violation), Heisner v. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 7:18 am
: Whirlpool Corporation v Kenwood Ltd (IPKat) EWHC (Pat): EP 258 valid in Netherlands but not UK: Novartis AG and Cibavision AG v Johnson & Johnson Medical Ltd & Ors (IPKat) EWHC (QB): When lawfully seized items can’t be retained under s 22 Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (1709 Copyright Blog) United States US General Obama IP vacancies (IP Frontline) Kappos confirmation hearing set for 29 July (IP Watchdog) (IAM) (Peter… [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 5:30 am
Next the Court looked to the well-settled rule articulated by the United States Supreme Court in St. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 7:56 am
Although this view of insider trading can be justified by the policy objectives underlying the Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 6:38 am
(1709 Copyright Blog) Nigeria Updates on battling copyright piracy in Nigeria (Afro-IP) South Korea Crazy copyright law set to cause chaos in South Korea (TorrentFreak) Sweden New owners of Pirate Bay, Global Gaming Factory X, to adopt ‘give and take’ payment models (1709 Copyright Blog) United Kingdom Microsoft tops Superbrands survey (IPKat) EWHC (Comm) ruling on transmission royalties in Excelsior Group Productions Ltd… [read post]
Eleventh Circuit Notes Split Re Standard of Review for a District Court's Denial of a Franks Hearing
24 Jul 2009, 4:21 am
” United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 1:02 am
However, the judge did not err in applying Article 7(1)(e); what he had actually done was to state that the policy underlying that article was relevant to the assessment of whether there was a sufficient similarity for the purposes of Article 9(1)(c), both the mark and the sign being shapes. * An assessment of similarity had to be carried out on a global basis by reference to the degree of similarity between the mark and the sign (here the Court cited Case C-252/07 Intel… [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 8:26 pm
Mark Lift Indus., Inc., 366 S.C. 308, 622 S.E.3d 213 (2005) addressed this issue in a certified question from the United States District Court. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 7:43 am
On June 19, 2009, in Zino Davidoff SA v. [read post]
21 Jul 2009, 12:37 pm
Ceballos, the United States Supreme Court held that a government employee's speech made in a official capacity was not protected under the First Amendment. [read post]
21 Jul 2009, 8:11 am
Furman v. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 2:00 am
(PatLit) United States US General House approves USPTO funding bill (Managing Intellectual Property) US measures to strengthen trade enforcement (Intellectual Property Watch) US Patents Peer-to-patent project set on hold. [read post]
19 Jul 2009, 10:34 pm
See United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2009, 7:31 am
This post is by my colleagues Mark Schonfeld, John Sturc, Barry Goldsmith, Eric Creizman, Jennifer Colgan Halter, Akita St. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 4:36 pm
Carlton Fields Fishing Trip Sponsored Topics: Mark Cuban - sport - Dallas Mavericks - United States - InsiderTrading [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 11:11 am
Here, the TTAB held that "[t]he fact that applicant is a foreign entity that is representing itself without previous experience in United States trademark procedure cannot avoid a finding of fraud. [read post]
