Search for: "Waites v. State"
Results 9221 - 9240
of 12,159
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2011, 12:41 pm
"In United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 1:00 am
That seems rather oppressive, if correctly stated but that’s another issue. [read post]
26 Mar 2011, 6:49 am
Lee v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 4:39 pm
" Jameel Jaffer sums up the state of play in the ACLU's work to expose illegal surveillance. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 12:54 pm
As of now, everyone is waiting to see what happens. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 11:23 am
The case, Commonwealth of Virginia v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 4:56 am
To volunteer at a site, use the online tool to find a center near you or call the IRS at 1.800.829.1040 (this time of year, be prepared to wait). [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 4:00 am
The complaint (full text) in Evergreen Association, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 4:32 pm
Bruce V. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 6:53 am
In Tekle v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2009] 2 All ER 193 Blake J. found that the Article 8 rights of an asylum seeker forced to wait four years for his fresh claim to be decided and denied permission to work during this period were breached. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 3:00 am
In Holmes v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 9:18 pm
VisionChina apparently waited more than a year after reading the E&Y Report to bring its case against the DMG investors. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 11:14 am
The Ninth Circuit is waiting for the California Supreme Court to provide it with some legal advice on a question of state law that may influence whether anyone can continue to defend in court the validity of the marriage ban — that is, whether the backers of the ban can defend it since state officials have refused to do so. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 10:57 am
., United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 6:24 am
At Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger is “still waiting on Cullen v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 3:43 am
Lumba (WL) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 12 (23 March 2011) – Read judgment / press summary The Supreme Court has ruled that it was unlawful and a “serious abuse of power” for the Home Office to follow an unpublished policy on the detention of foreign national prisoners which contradicted its published policy. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 9:14 pm
Naturally, she sued the railroad.The issue in Palsgraf v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 8:13 am
” With this filing in Virginia v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 7:54 am
Vice, being argued today, is addressed in a separate post.We are still waiting on Cullen v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 3:50 am
State Supreme Court Judge William McCooe said it was untimely and dismissed Gomez’s petition. [read post]
