Search for: "Child v. Child"
Results 9241 - 9260
of 31,209
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2017, 4:48 pm
Where judges are satisfied that evidence shows things have changed or could change in time, say with the right support, in a time frame realistic for the child (eg. new parental insight, parenting changes or capacity to accept support), they regularly find permanent removal unnecessary and some other option best. [read post]
1 Apr 2017, 1:12 pm
In this case, C.S. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2017, 1:12 pm
In this case, C.S. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2017, 4:33 am
After his adoption, Brindley received thousands of dollars from the trust as a beneficiary.Under Stefanos v. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 10:00 pm
For example, in Hurst v. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 8:13 am
The New Jersey Supreme Court in Kinsella v. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 8:13 am
The New Jersey Supreme Court in Kinsella v. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 3:42 pm
Those who use the courts get at least respectful coverage like this New York Times story, “In Lawsuit After Lawsuit, It’s Everyday People v. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 12:08 pm
In United States v. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 10:26 am
. *** See Galarza v. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 9:19 am
Here’s an odd Indiana Court of Appeals decision (Newcomer v. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 4:41 am
The first was Turner v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 9:01 pm
It appeared as though their political involvement since the entry of Jerry Falwell’s Moral Majority in 1979 had led to one spectacular defeat after another—Roe v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 9:01 pm
It appeared as though their political involvement since the entry of Jerry Falwell’s Moral Majority in 1979 had led to one spectacular defeat after another—Roe v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 3:37 pm
On March 24, 2017, the International Criminal Court, Chamber of the First Instance II issued a landmark ruling on reparations in Prosecutor v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 1:45 pm
Last year, February 9, 2016, the Fourteenth District Court of Appeals in Distefano v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 12:50 pm
In today’s case (Sandhu v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 8:00 am
While not explicitly stated – because this is a work of legal history – this Article obviously has implications for modern issues surrounding marriage equality, child-custody based on interstate recognitions of status changes, the interstate recognition of gender transitions, and the legal rights of non-citizens within the United States. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 7:27 am
Accordingly, the court denied the university’s motion to dismiss (Holmes v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 6:07 am
Additional Resources: Steagald v. [read post]
