Search for: "Downs v State" Results 9241 - 9260 of 40,862
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Apr 2017, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
Popplewell J explained that the test laid down in section 12(3) of the HRA 1998, which requires the court to be satisfied that an applicant is “likely” to establish that publication should not be allowed in order to grant an interim order, was a “flexible test“. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 7:51 am by Kali Borkoski
The highlights of yesterday’s testimony by Justices Breyer and Kennedyon Capitol Hill had little to do with the Court’s proposed budget of $75.5 million (down from last year). [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 1:16 pm
The Supreme Court's 4-1 decision Tuesday in the case of Sophia Willis v. [read post]
31 Jan 2021, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
On 29 January 2021, Nicklin J handed down judgment in the case of Haviland v The Andrew Lownie Literary Agency Ltd. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
Yesterday's Las Vegas Sun reports that the ACLU of Nevada has filed a lawsuit in federal court against the state of Nevada and Clark County (NV) challenging the constitutionality of the state law that limits the issuance of state certificates to perform marriages to clergy, judges and commissioners and deputy commissioners of civil marriage. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 8:45 am by Venkat Balasubramani
CUS Nashville Employee Terminated for Facebook Message Fails to State Public Policy Claim — Barnett v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 12:15 pm by E. R. Wrigley
R(on the application of Binyam Mohamed) v Secretary of State for Foreign & Commonwealth Affairs [2010] EWCA Civ 65 This appeal was brought by the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs (“the Foreign Secretary”) against a decision of the Divisional Court to include seven short paragraphs in the open version of a judgment, notwithstanding the fact that the Foreign Secretary had started in a number of Public Interest Immunity Certificates… [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 7:00 am by Will Baude
I will try to boil my reasons down to five quick points: Article III, as correctly interpreted by Marbury v. [read post]