Search for: "Hope v. Hope" Results 9241 - 9260 of 23,990
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Feb 2015, 11:16 am by Michael Risch
This development, copyright owners hope, will combat increasingly fair use — favorable case law. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 4:46 am by Michael C. Dorf
If you don't want to read the column . . . well shame on you . . . but okay, here's a very rough summary:(1) Twitter wasn't worth the $44 billion Musk agreed to pay for it in April and it's worth even less now; (2) under the terms of the deal, that doesn't excuse Musk's performance; (3) neither do his contentions about bot accounts or Twitter's cooperation since April; (4) so, at least if the complaint is basically accurate in the facts it recounts, Musk is in… [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 2:00 am by John Day
 In the face of such an assertion, the trier of fact must distinguish between persons with only vague hopes of entering a new profession and those with the demonstrated ability and intent to do so. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 12:00 am by Samantha Knights, Matrix.
Fourthly, there was a side debate about whether the summary of the Hardial Singh principles in R (I) v SSHD [2002] EWCA Civ 888 by Dyson LJ (as he then was) was accurate. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 7:43 am by Ben
It seems having originally investigated how it might resurrect the web-block elements of SOPA/PIPA in Congress without causing so much controversy (which seems to have been a fanciful hope!) [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 6:24 am by David Post
” (One commenter — I hope in jest — said he’d vote for Satan in a hypothetical Satan-Clinton matchup. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 9:32 am by Shannon Togawa Mercer
Until then, many in the Remain camp will be nervously hoping for another bite at the Brexit apple. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 12:15 pm
            We don’t think the plaintiffs in Dunbar v. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 12:41 pm by Daniel Nazer
We hope that his example will protect smaller podcasters from further attacks from this troll. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 5:15 am by Michael C. Dorf
I just don't think it's his preferred course of action.However, if the Democrats were to abolish the filibuster now and enact a law more or less codifying Roe v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 8:26 pm
Whenever someone who is wealthy as ECUSA is spends so much on an uphill legal battle, which it has no rational hope of winning, the motive has to be simply to hope to win by outspending one's opponent. [read post]