Search for: "House v. House" Results 9241 - 9260 of 41,245
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Aug 2019, 9:57 am by Zneimer & Zneimer, P.C.
Housing Act of 1937; and (5) Medicaid, except for: (i) Benefits received for an emergency medical condition as described in 42 U.S.C. 1396b(v)(2)-(3), 42 CFR 440.255(c); (ii) Services or benefits funded by Medicaid but provided under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) 20 U.S.C. 1400 et seq.; (iii) School-based services or benefits provided to individuals who are at or below the oldest age eligible for secondary education as determined under State or local law;… [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 8:10 am by Laya Maheshwari
In 2017, the Indian Supreme Court, in the case State Bank of India v Santosh Gupta, observed that even though Article 370 was labeled a “[t]emporary provision[]” and the Constituent Assembly had dissolved, the article “continue[s] to be in force” (¶12)—thus indicating it had attained permanent status. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 2:56 am by Walter Olson
The wrong answer would let the government push around owners in disputes over rails-to-trails projects [Trevor Burrus on Cato Institute amicus brief on Federal Circuit case of Caquelin v. [read post]
11 Aug 2019, 11:46 pm by Helen Macpherson (AU)
The House of Representatives Standing Committee on Indigenous Affairs published its 2018 Report on the Impact of Inauthentic Art and Craft in the Style of First Nations Peoples. [read post]
11 Aug 2019, 11:46 pm by Helen Macpherson (AU)
The House of Representatives Standing Committee on Indigenous Affairs published its 2018 Report on the Impact of Inauthentic Art and Craft in the Style of First Nations Peoples. [read post]
11 Aug 2019, 11:19 am by Giles Peaker
    The post Once bitten, twice (or thrice) shy appeared first on Nearly Legal: Housing Law News and Comment. [read post]
11 Aug 2019, 9:51 am by Giles Peaker
On the Housing Act point and the issue of fact finding, Bubb v Wandsworth LBC  (2011) EWCA Civ 1285 remained binding authority that the county court cannot decide disputed facts in a s.204 appeal. [read post]
11 Aug 2019, 4:30 am by SHG
v=dwTQ_U3p5Wc&t=334s and scientific literature at https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811917305268 or  https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2489204/. [read post]
10 Aug 2019, 4:34 am by Vishnu Kannan
He also shared the Department of Justice’s amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 1:36 pm by John Ross
That's because courts have shunned the only means available for obtaining relief: Bivens v. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 11:34 am by Rebecca Tushnet
A: there are a few, like USB House. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 9:05 am by Tim Zinnecker
v=DO4J_PC1b5M and learn more at https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/20/travel/detroit-michigan-downtown.html. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 5:35 am by Jackie McDermott
In the United States, to implement such a system via constitutional amendment, the process laid out by Article V requires that two-thirds of both houses of Congress propose the amendment, or that the amendment arises from a convention called for by two-thirds of state legislatures. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
House Democrats File Lawsuit to Enforce Subpoena Against McGahn The Hill – Olivia Beavers, Jacqueline Thomsen, and Morgan Chalfant | Published: 8/7/2019 House Judiciary Committee Chairperson Jerrold Nadler filed a civil lawsuit to enforce a subpoena for testimony from Don McGahn, the former White House counsel who at the Trump administration’s direction defied lawmakers’ request to appear before the committee. [read post]