Search for: "Label v Label"
Results 9241 - 9260
of 13,305
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Sep 2015, 12:40 pm
The Sixth Circuit held that similar to Wright v. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 3:11 pm
As the Federal Circuit held in Egyptian Goddess v. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 1:13 pm
Obviousness-Type Double Patenting As explained in Eli Lilly and Co. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2021, 10:40 am
Another view is the Cooper v. [read post]
28 May 2021, 10:32 pm
They brought butter knives to a gunfight (a quote from a document that surfaced in the recent Epic Games v. [read post]
14 Jul 2018, 6:53 am
However, Director Hinman made it clear that the label given to a particular digital asset, such as a “utility token,” is inconsequential as to whether it is a security or not. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 6:21 am
This week’s Lawfare Podcast featured a discussion of another crucial military commissions case, Al Bahlul v. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 1:09 pm
Arcona, Inc. v. [read post]
22 May 2017, 9:40 am
Bratton v. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 3:17 pm
Id.at *27 (relying on Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2018, 3:12 pm
" Indeed, as stated in Snyder v. [read post]
21 Sep 2018, 7:18 am
Board of Comm'rs v. [read post]
24 Dec 2017, 6:12 am
The test is whether the average consumer, who is reasonably well informed and reasonably observant and circumspect, would be led to believe that a connection exists between the ingredient protected by the PDO, the packaging and labelling, and the PDO ‘Champagne’. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 10:09 am
Jan. 14, 2013); then a day later – Desai v. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 11:26 am
USA Nutraceuticals Group, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 12:00 am
Already, the South African government has labelled the coronavirus a "disaster” within the meaning of Disaster Management Act 2002. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 12:52 am
This change was made at the express suggestion of the registrar (Cadbury's application had been to amend the description to "the mark consists of the colour purple as shown applied to the packaging or labelling of goods covered by the registration".The reason for this application to change the mark was the impact of the decision in Société des Produits Nestlé SA v Cadbury UK Limited [2013] EWCA Civ 1174 ("Cadbury 1")… [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 1:38 am
While Huawei v. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 4:56 am
Casper Sleep, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2019, 11:12 am
See, e.g., Chrysler v. [read post]
