Search for: "STATE v. SMALL" Results 9241 - 9260 of 16,894
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2019, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
Law societies will have a difficult time investigating even a small number of them. [read post]
17 Jul 2021, 5:10 am by MEL
In a recent decision from the Ontario Superior Court of Justice, 1475182 Ontario Inc. o/a Edges Contracting v. [read post]
20 Jan 2024, 4:58 am by SHG
Making videos of small animals being crushed by high heels may be protected First Amendment activity (really, see United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 5:47 am by Biersdorf & Associates
Our Response: This issue was recently ruled upon by the Wisconsin Supreme Court in KLEMM v. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 1:59 am by Eleonora Rosati
He went on to find that earlier pages in the sales process, including the full product details page, also targeted the UK, not least because that page stated “This item ships to the United Kingdom”. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 10:49 am by Dr. Cassandra Steer
Article V of the Outer Space Treaty denotes astronauts as “envoys of humankind”, and creates an obligation to assist the astronauts of another State which crash on one’s own territory or on the high seas; or if a State has astronauts of its own in space who can help the astronauts of another State in space, they must do so. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 9:00 am by Guest Blogger
  The cases they discuss are the Massachusetts and California cases finding a right to same sex marriage (as well as the legislative arguments made successfully to support New York’s Marriage Equality Act); another is the Lawrence v Texas, which they argue validated intimacy, whether homosexual or heterosexual, as both a moral good and a protected choice. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
The Court of Appeals combined oral argument in Roni with a second case, Assured Guaranty (UK) Ltd. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 1:59 am
 The basic problem lies in the fact that only a small fraction of foodborne disease cases get reported through official (or unofficial) reporting systems. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 6:02 am by Thorsten Bausch
This means that it was null and of no effect: see, if authority were needed, R (UNISON) v Lord Chancellor [2017] UKSC 51, para 119. [read post]