Search for: "Sales v. State"
Results 9241 - 9260
of 21,158
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2015, 10:59 am
On the first question regarding foreign sales, plaintiff Lexmark relied on Federal Circuit precedent Jazz Photo, which held that a patent is exhausted only when the authorized first sale occurs in the United States. [read post]
1 May 2015, 10:00 am
Kim, that under United States v. [read post]
1 May 2015, 9:19 am
We may have jumped the gun last week when we stated that Davis v. [read post]
1 May 2015, 8:58 am
Michigan News <> Attorney General v. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 2:31 pm
The Supreme Court’s decision in Williams-Yulee v. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 10:14 am
This includes tracing the proceeds from the sale of the real property” (Matter of Conklin, supra at *6 [relying on Labella v Goodman,198 AD2d 332 [2d Dept 1993]; see also Matter of Wallace, 86 Misc 2d 175, 180 [Sur Ct, Cattaraugus County 1976] [opining proceeds of a sale of specifically bequeathed property “do not constitute the legacy bequeathed,” and thus, “the general rule of ademption applies and the legacy fails”]). [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 10:14 am
This includes tracing the proceeds from the sale of the real property” (Matter of Conklin, supra at *6 [relying on Labella v Goodman,198 AD2d 332 [2d Dept 1993]; see also Matter of Wallace, 86 Misc 2d 175, 180 [Sur Ct, Cattaraugus County 1976] [opining proceeds of a sale of specifically bequeathed property “do not constitute the legacy bequeathed,” and thus, “the general rule of ademption applies and the legacy fails”]). [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 7:14 am
" Cordelia Lighting, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 1:38 pm
” (United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 1:38 pm
” (United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 11:37 am
Use of the predecessor’s trade name, sale of a predecessor’s products, and retention of the predecessor’s accounts and employees will not alone suffice. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 8:57 am
Grocery Manufacturers Association, et al v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 8:18 am
On April 21, 2015, the Supreme Court decided Oneok, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 1:18 am
At the hearing, Ticketogo's solicitor stated that the true number of licensees was actually over 60 companies. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 10:16 am
In 2013, in Chevron v. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 6:54 am
’” His conduct was also sufficiently reprehensible to qualify for punitive damages under state law (Marlo v. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 4:23 am
” The sales contract did not state the square feet of the building. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 8:59 am
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Delta Construction Company v. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 8:00 am
In Richey v. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 7:06 am
Even assuming the employee established a prima facie case, he could not show that his employer’s stated reason for his discharge—his consistent failure to meet his sales quotas and to learn the Compass system—was pretextual. [read post]
