Search for: "State v. House" Results 9241 - 9260 of 28,796
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Mar 2018, 6:00 am by Jeff Watters
The chair of the Estate and Trust Legislative Affairs Committee of the State Bar of Texas Real Estate, Probate, and Trust Law Section said the new subsection “appears to be an attempt to statutorily overrule the decision in Kappus v. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 4:30 am by Edith Roberts
At Techdirt, Tim Cushing looks at this week’s argument in United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 1:17 pm by Nancy E. Halpern, D.V.M.
Ct. 1986) (reversing holding that owner’s monkey was not a domesticated house pet); Turudic v. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 10:58 am by William Ford
The Supreme Court heard oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 6:55 am by Public Employment Law Press
Summarily terminating a federal officer holding a term appointment from his or her positionPHH Corporation v Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, USCA District of Columbia Circuit, Docket #15-1177NYPPL earlier summarized the decision in PHH Corporation v Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, a decision in which the United States Circuit Court of Appeals,  District of Columbia Circuit  considered the issue of summarily removing a public officer holding a term… [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 6:55 am by Public Employment Law Press
Summarily terminating a federal officer holding a term appointment from his or her positionPHH Corporation v Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, USCA District of Columbia Circuit, Docket #15-1177NYPPL earlier summarized the decision in PHH Corporation v Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, a decision in which the United States Circuit Court of Appeals,  District of Columbia Circuit [Docket #15-1177] considered the issue of summarily removing a public officer… [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 6:05 am by Terry Hart
But that meant it had to figure out a way to state it in a manner that courts could apply. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 1:50 pm by Rachel Sandler
Subscribers include public relations professionals, journalists, politicians, the White House and the United States Army.[2] The dispute began in 2013 when Fox sued TVEyes for copyright infringement, comparing TVEyes to an illegal video-on-demand service. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 1:38 pm by William Ford
ICYMI: Yesterday on Lawfare In preparation for Tuesday’s oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 1:36 pm by Christopher G. Hill
The Court then examined the negligence per se count plead based upon the Virginia state building codes and state real estate licensing statutes. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 1:36 pm by Christopher G. Hill
The Court then examined the negligence per se count plead based upon the Virginia state building codes and state real estate licensing statutes. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 11:35 am by Andrew Keane Woods
The Supreme Court heard oral argument Tuesday morning in United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 1:32 pm by Giles Peaker
If anything, the recent Supreme Court judgment on indirect discrimination by a provision, criterion or practice (PCP) in Essop and others (Appellants) v Home Office (UK Border Agency) (Respondent) Naeem (Appellant) v Secretary of State for Justice (Respondent) (2017) UKSC 27 might have made such a claim more straightforward to bring. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 12:11 pm by William Ford
The Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in United States v. [read post]