Search for: "The State Bar Court of the State Bar of California"
Results 9241 - 9260
of 11,378
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Apr 2010, 8:47 am
There is also an interesting post about the case by Daniel Solove on the Concurring Opinions blog The California Court of Appeal confirmed the summary dismissal of a libel claim by an anonymised claimant, Jane Doe against Channel 4 over an episode of the Ali G show. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 11:26 am
Concepcion, 563 U.S. 333, 347-48 (2011), the Supreme Court held that the FAA preempted California state law, which deemed such class-action waivers unconscionable in consumer cases. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 3:00 am
UPH avers that this position finds support from courts in the federal Sixth and Eleventh Circuits, as well as state court decisions from New York, Texas, Indiana, and Florida. [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 2:50 am
Nowhere is the problem more
pronounced than in California, which faces an $8
billion federal court order to improve health care for
prisoners. [read post]
5 May 2015, 1:55 pm
When it comes to selective discounts, the California Supreme Court has stated that businesses may offer “reduced rates to all customers on one day each week,” “might offer a discount to any customer who meets a condition which any patron could satisfy,” or might offer “discounts for purchasing commodities in quantity, or for making advance reservations. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 3:49 pm
Pruitt, No. 06-6002 Given the particular characteristics of North Carolina sentencing law, in light of recent United States Supreme Court precedent, in determining whether to apply the career offender provision of the United States Sentencing Guidelines, a federal court must take into account the defendant's state criminal history (or lack thereof) at the time of his predicate North Carolina convictions. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 6:15 pm
Yusuf, No. 07-3308 Unpaid taxes are "proceeds" of mail fraud for purposes of sufficiently stating an international money laundering offense. . [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 2:08 pm
The candidate must be barred in the State of Wisconsin. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 11:05 am
Some years later, in 1999, a similar set of procedures was adopted by the United States Attorney’s Office in the Northern District of California in a manual drafted by one of the authors of the EDNY memo who had moved there and served as head of the Criminal Division. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 12:13 pm
California Supreme Court ruled in Minkler v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 11:05 am
The petition asked whether the California Supreme Court violates the First Amendment right to petition for redress of grievances by barring prisoners represented in name only from making pro se filings. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 5:42 pm
California Coastal Commission and Dolan v. [read post]
20 Aug 2021, 8:18 am
Similar lawsuits are pending in federal courts in California and Connecticut. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 5:19 pm
United States Issue: Whether the district court correctly instructed the jury on materiality, whether the district court properly excluded the testimony of a witness under Fed. [read post]
4 May 2020, 10:00 am
Mark Geragos responded, stating “Travelers Insurance, after cashing our premium checks for years, decided yesterday that instead of paying our business interruption claim that they would hire a large law firm to sue us in federal court instead. [read post]
30 Jan 2021, 9:50 am
Edible Arrangements sued Google in Georgia state court for theft of personal property, conversion, money had and received, and civil RICO. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 9:45 pm
Applicants must be planning to take the summer California Bar Exam and commit to the one-year position beginning in or around August. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 7:54 am
Federal Communications CommissionDocket: 11-691Issue(s): Whether this Court should reconsider its decision in FCC v. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 6:23 am
The court found that the expert’s methods didn’t meet the Daubert standard and therefore barred him from testifying. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 7:54 am
* California State Bar Standing Committee on Professional Responsibility and Conduct Opinion No. 2010-179: Whether an attorney violates his or her duties of confidentiality and competence when using technology to transmit or store confidential client information will depend on the particular technology being used and the circumstances surrounding such use. [read post]
