Search for: "United States v. Close"
Results 9241 - 9260
of 14,201
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Sep 2012, 11:25 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Sep 2012, 7:10 am
The Supreme Court of the United States has announced the cases it will review, and one of those is a sexual harassment case out of Indiana. [read post]
29 Sep 2012, 6:22 am
The Supreme Court of the United States has agreed to take on the issue of warrantless blood testing of suspected drunk drivers. [read post]
26 Sep 2012, 12:03 pm
CoxIn Sparks v. [read post]
26 Sep 2012, 7:00 am
It is my sincere belief that if you polled patent attorneys in the United States, you’d find that 9 out of 10 feel (or, if they closely followed the Apple case – felt) that design patents were a bit of a joke. [read post]
20 Sep 2012, 9:24 am
By Tyler Baker and Ted Max On September 5, 2012, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued its long-awaited and highly anticipated decision in Christian Louboutin S.A. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 10:44 am
By Tyler Baker and Ted Max On September 5, 2012, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued its long-awaited and highly anticipated decision in Christian Louboutin S.A. v. [read post]
17 Sep 2012, 4:20 pm
It's a subject close to his heart. [read post]
17 Sep 2012, 2:10 am
Prior to the United States Supreme Court decision in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
16 Sep 2012, 5:14 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
16 Sep 2012, 6:08 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 8:27 am
The logical and readily available alternative was the smallest salable infringing unit with close relation to the claimed invention—namely the processor itself. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 8:27 am
The United States Supreme Court is regularly subjected to such arguments, especially from amici (including foreign government amici). [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 6:04 am
found . . . that the 2006 and 2009 MCAs provided for military detention of those individuals who “purposefully and materially supported” enemy belligerents of the United States or its coalition partners (the MCAs are not, however, statutes authorizing the use of military force). [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 12:40 pm
Louis v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 11:56 am
If there's no stay and if Samsung then enforces, we'll be close to or after Christmas, and resellers will have plenty of iPhone 5 units in their warehouses, so actual business impact would take until next year.Two of those Mannheim lawsuits are over standard-essential patents, while two are not. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 11:05 am
In National Association of the Deaf v Netflix, Inc., C.A. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 7:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 4:52 am
Perhaps in some other country a tale like this would not be surprising, but in modern United States one would not expect this kind of story. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 1:23 am
First State Ins. [read post]
