Search for: "United States v. Peoples" Results 9241 - 9260 of 22,873
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Aug 2022, 10:21 am by becassidy
This comes on the heels of the case decided by the Court in May of this year: United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 8:10 am by Larkin Reynolds
-controlled portion will be used to “interrogate people seized from countries outside Afghanistan. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 3:00 am
Can we live in a UNITED States that is so disunited State by State? [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 7:40 am by boston
The City of El Paso ruling that some of the people and entities named in the lawsuit, such as Cook and the city of El Paso, don’t even have the power to enforce a state law.The ADF’s claim that the Texas statute violated the church’s First Amendment right was not persuasive. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 8:39 am
Yesterday, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas issued a ruling on the parties' motions for summary judgment in Firearms Policy Coalition, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am by David Kris
Wiretap Act (also known as Title III) prohibits the interception of a live communication (e.g., a telephone call) only if the interception occurs in the United States; it does not prohibit or regulate wiretaps (interception) conducted abroad.[8]  Similarly, the U.S. [read post]
Roberts said, “The United States Government says this is critically important because our friends, allies, intelligence sources around the world have to believe that we keep our word, and our word was this is secret. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 11:16 am
The United States asks us to affirm this sentence. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 10:07 am
The Court concludes therefore that there is insufficient evidence to show general causation.Federal and State Courts have consistently determined that the cause or causes of MCS (IEI) cannot be reliably established by scientific proof (see, e.g., Oppenheimer v United Charities of NY, 266 AD2d 116, 698 NYS2d 144 [1st Dept 1999]; Frank v State of New York, 972 F Supp 130 [ND NY 1997]). [read post]