Search for: "AD " Results 9261 - 9280 of 200,626
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Oct 2023, 8:56 am
Now, the new HBO, called Max, offers an ad-supported option, for $9.99 compared to the $15.99-19.99 ad-free option. https://www.cabletv.com/hbo-max. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 6:12 am
The Greater Wisconsin Committee raised $280,000 to run an ad opposing it.How could an unknown challenger with no TV ads beat a well-known incumbent with lots of ads? [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 7:30 am
§8.01-379.1 guarantees Plaintiff the right to plead and argue his pleaded ad damnum to the jury. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 2:24 am by Edgar (aka MrConsumer)
Here is a sample ad from Food Depot (“a new way to save”). [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 2:30 pm
But a clear reading of that sentence — really the only way to read that sentence — indicates that the legislation simply added the requirement insofar as they were already taking in a class. [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 4:30 am
But a clear reading of that sentence — really the only way to read that sentence — indicates that the legislation simply added the requirement insofar as they were already taking in a class. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 8:50 am by Jonathan Bailey
The company first tried to argue that the company was anti-competitive by both blocking ads and simultaneously running an “Acceptable Ads” program. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 7:06 am
I'd like to see these ads, but if somehow the Russians figured out how to make a devastating race-based ad, I think there would have been Americans copying that message and running it on their own and we'd have been seeing it going viral on YouTube. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 1:09 pm
While much of the content of the ad appears more about vindicating his deceased brother's memory, bashing the local chief of police, and denouncing bad guys (who he will no longer represent), Casino can now combine this ad with his "traditional" (and entertaining) ads for personal injury. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 7:16 am by John Ottaviani
 This means that if an ad would be deceptive without a disclosure, and the disclosure cannot be made conspicuously on a particular device or platform, then the ad should not run on that device or platform.The FTC now feels that disclosures should be "as close as possible" to the relevant claim. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 7:16 am by John Ottaviani
 This means that if an ad would be deceptive without a disclosure, and the disclosure cannot be made conspicuously on a particular device or platform, then the ad should not run on that device or platform.The FTC now feels that disclosures should be "as close as possible" to the relevant claim. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 7:22 am
ADDED: Remember when "You Don't Own Me" was an Obama ad? [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 2:53 pm by Daniel Nazer
Many, including the King Center, have been wondering how Chrysler came to use a speech that included criticism of car ads in a car ad. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 6:15 am by Rebecca Jeschke
“The failure of the ad industry and privacy groups to reach a compromise on DNT has led to a viral surge in ad blocking, massive losses for Internet companies dependent on ad revenue, and increasingly malicious methods of tracking users and surfacing advertisements online,” said Disconnect CEO Casey Oppenheim. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 3:31 pm
All of this weakens the constraints of the jus ad bellum regime more generally, thus raising the risk of inter-state war. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 1:34 pm by Stacy K. Marcus
For TV ads, disclosures “should be on the screen long enough to be noticed, read, and understood, and other elements in the ads should not obscure or distract from the disclosures. [read post]
1 May 2012, 8:07 am by Jamie Rubin
  AT&T, one of the state’s most active advertisers, immediately raised concerns about the rule, noting that 10-point font size might be too large for some ads, or far too small for others. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 8:40 am by Steve Baird
Or, would the ad not fly here because the architects might be more likely to sue? [read post]
24 Jul 2006, 12:07 pm
I could not agree more with you regarding your comments related to mixing up the ad bellum and in bello concepts.What really strikes me as surprising is the general failure to cite the precise language of AP I. [read post]