Search for: "Class Action Defense" Results 9261 - 9280 of 12,826
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jul 2010, 9:14 am by Joe Consumer
The case, on behalf of a class of some 32,000 patients, took seven months. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 9:14 am by Joe Consumer
The case, on behalf of a class of some 32,000 patients, took seven months. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 4:47 am
As noted above, defense attorneys removed the putative class action to federal court, and the district court granted a defense motion to compel plaintiffs to arbitrate their claims on an individual basis, upholding the enforceability of the class action waiver. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 8:47 pm
As noted above, defense attorneys removed the putative class action to federal court, and the district court granted a defense motion to compel plaintiffs to arbitrate their claims on an individual basis, upholding the enforceability of the class action waiver. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 3:39 am by Russ Bensing
  In a per curiam opinion, the Court vacates this and sends it back for another look; Scalia dissents, concluding that, considering the heinous circumstances of the offense, “it is impossible to say that substituting the ‘deprived-childhood-cum-brain-damage’ defense for the ‘good-middle-class-kid-who-made-a-mistake’ defense would probably have produced a different verdict. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 6:31 am
AG Yve Bot’s opinion in Flos SpA v Semeraro Casa e Famiglia SpA (Class 99)(Class 99) Breton flour: from peasant tradition to GI protection (Class 46)     Germany The Zappanale goes on! [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 5:10 am
The author of the Class Action Defense Blog wishes all of you a very happy Independence Day. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 4:08 am by Ted Frank
Perhaps: one the one hand, I was invited to one conference panel, where I spoke freely (if without pay) about problems I perceived in the class action arena; on the other hand, I've never been invited back, so perhaps they made a mistake the first time. [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 9:10 pm
The author of the Class Action Defense Blog wishes all of you a very happy Independence Day. [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 6:02 pm by Duncan
AG Yve Bot’s opinion in Flos SpA v Semeraro Casa e Famiglia SpA (Class 99)(Class 99) Breton flour: from peasant tradition to GI protection (Class 46) Germany The Zappanale goes on! [read post]
3 Jul 2010, 6:54 am
To assist class action defense attorneys anticipate the types of lawsuits against which they will have to defend in California courts, we provide weekly, unofficial summaries of the legal categories for new class action lawsuits filed in California state and federal courts in the Los Angeles, San Francisco, San Jose, Sacramento, San Diego, San Mateo, Oakland/Alameda and Orange County areas. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 10:54 pm
To assist class action defense attorneys anticipate the types of lawsuits against which they will have to defend in California courts, we provide weekly, unofficial summaries of the legal categories for new class action lawsuits filed in California state and federal courts in the Los Angeles, San Francisco, San Jose, Sacramento, San Diego, San Mateo, Oakland/Alameda and Orange County areas. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 5:34 pm by Robinson, Calcagnie & Robinson
Here, the broad release language follows the enumeration of boat divers and multiple day renters as the classes of persons to whom it applies. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 5:00 pm by Bexis
  Rosson said "no way": Among other things, to establish negligence per se by violation of a statute or regulation, the injured party must be one of a class intended to be protected by the statute or regulation. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:58 pm by carie
Several lawsuits are pending in Georgia, and courts in New York and Michigan recently have given the green light to class actions against those state systems for alleged failures to provide adequate legal representation.Georgia's problems are long-standing. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:02 am
Defense attorneys removed the lawsuits to federal court under the Class Action Fairness Act (CAFA), asserting that the lawsuits fell within CAFA’s “mass action” provision “which allows the removal of cases joining the claims of at least 100 plaintiffs that otherwise meet CAFA’s jurisdictional requirements. [read post]