Search for: "Defendants A-F" Results 9261 - 9280 of 29,832
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Sep 2016, 6:56 am
., 287 F.2d 492 (2d Cir. 1961) and include the strength of the mark, the degree of similarity of the marks, the degree of similarity of the products, the likelihood that the senior user would expand, actual confusion, the defendant’s motive and good faith, the quality of the defendant’s product, the sophistication of the buyer class. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 12:46 pm
Dep’t of Health and Human Services, ___ F. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 1:00 pm by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
If a defendant is on Probation, the case will be assigned to the Judge that originally heard the case(s).Which Judge will  preside over my Tampa / Hillsborough County Drug Crimes Case? [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 6:33 am
Probation revocation hearing - (in-custody) - Must be set within 2 weeks (14 days) after complaint is filed Crim.P. 32(f )(4), at 18 CRS § 16-11-206(4), at 49, § 87 Probation revocation-action upon proof of violation - 1 week (7 days) after hearing Crim.P. 32 (f )(5), at 18 CRS § 16-11-206(5), at 49, § 87 [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
County of Nassau, 292 F.3d 307, 324–25 and that "conclusory, vague, or general allegations” that the defendants engaged in a conspiracy fail to state a claim.Finally, Appeals held that the district court did not err by denying Petitioner leave to amend as a district court properly denies leave to amend if the amendment would be futile. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 8:11 am by Scott J. Kreppein, Esq.
Bowen, 278 F.3d 103, 106 (2d Cir. 2002)($400,000 emotional distress award for First Amendment Retaliation based upon supporting an opposing candidate for Sherriff where “defendants' animosity permeated plaintiff's work environment). [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 4:10 pm by Eugene Volokh
We have also ruled that requiring a defendant to produce a handwriting exemplar violates the self-incrimination provision. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 7:40 am by Jay Yurkiw
Hoosier Racing Tire Corp., 674 F.3d 158 (3d Cir. 2012), and held that “not all expenses associated with the production of ESI are recoverable by the prevailing party. [read post]