Search for: "Driver v. State"
Results 9261 - 9280
of 10,245
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jan 2025, 12:22 pm
The Florida Supreme Court affirmed the constitutionality of implied consent laws in their 1980 ruling in the case of State v. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 7:20 am
The problem is that the Supreme Court of the United States saw fit to condone this type of warrantless intrusion known as a sobriety check in the 1992 case of Michigan v. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 6:15 am
They shot at but missed his wife, Khalida Jasim Mohammed, and the driver. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 2:35 pm
Last month, the Minnesota Court of Appeals decided State v. [read post]
26 Aug 2019, 11:22 am
In Montanez v. [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 11:06 am
Arnold v. [read post]
21 Nov 2009, 2:43 am
Even as long ago as 1980 we felt it proper to 599 "assume" that unlawful police behavior would "be dealt with appropriately" by the authorities, United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 2:54 pm
Justice Kagan with opinion in Gundy v. [read post]
20 May 2021, 10:38 am
State v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm
State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 4:00 am
; Work Matters; Law.comArgued Awaiting Decision14 Penn Plaza LLC v. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 9:33 am
Aug. 9, 2016): This is a district court case where drivers assert misclassification claims against Lyft. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 9:06 am
Townsend v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 10:19 am
In the case of Knight v. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 9:00 am
In SCL v. v State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, 2017 CanLII 69241 (ON LAT), the Applicant was seriously injured when s/he was struck by a golf cart. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 2:50 pm
In today’s case (Wong v. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 5:02 am
Twenty years after Joy Silk, in NLRB v. [read post]
1 Mar 2009, 5:04 am
In a 1986 decision, Mc-Guiggan v. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 12:12 pm
Ten years ago the Fifth Circuit in United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 3:53 pm
He cites “a justice who served as an Arizona state legislator” and quotes from Sandra Day O’Connor’s opinion in Davis v. [read post]