Search for: "In Re Opinions of the Justices" Results 9261 - 9280 of 12,727
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Oct 2015, 5:30 am by SHG
And a great many opinions are dumber than dirt, and we’re allowed that as well. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 6:06 am by Bill Otis
The truth, as Justice Scalia showed in his scalding concurrence in Kansas v. [read post]
15 Jan 2025, 9:05 pm by renholding
  They serve 12-year terms, and reappointment requires re-nomination by the governor and re-approval by a majority of the State Senate. [read post]
3 Nov 2015, 4:24 am by SHG
Deny it all you want, but you’re fooling no one. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 3:08 am by SHG
© 2012 Simple Justice NY LLC. [read post]
17 Mar 2012, 5:00 pm by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
Despite the justices' active questioning of both lawyers to probe the weak points of their respective arguments, we're thinking that the court will conclude that although Rule 4 requires a motion followed by an order for "good cause," a stipulation really is nothing more than an unopposed motion (both, after all, are requests by a party or parties for the court to take some action), and the result of either is an order of the trial court ordering the action. [read post]
24 Aug 2014, 5:33 am by SHG
Copyright © 2013 Simple Justice NY, LLC This feed is for personal, non-commercial and Newstex use only. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 4:52 am by SHG
They’re making a show they want tons of people to watch. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 4:48 am by The Law Office of Philip D. Cave
”  Of interest in the court’s opinion is this observation. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 6:11 am by SHG
Copyright © 2007-2016 Simple Justice NY, LLC This feed is for personal, non-commercial and Newstex use only. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 2:36 am by SHG
Copyright © 2010 Simple Justice NY LLC. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 7:09 am
Ed. 2d 868 (2009)--over the dissent of Justice Souter, the author of the majority opinion in Bell Atlantic--to all cases, even a case (Iqbal itself) in which the court of appeals had 'promise[d] petitioners minimally intrusive discovery.' Id. at 1954. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 12:20 pm by Eugene Volokh
For the arguments, see the extended discussion at pp. 9809–9818 and 9822–9831 of the slip opinion; I can’t think of an excerpt that can do justice to the judges’ arguments.My sense, by the way, is that there’s a good chance that the Ninth Circuit will rehear the case en banc, given the subject matter of the case, the presence of a forceful dissent, and the tension among some past Ninth Circuit precedents about true threats, which can lead other judges… [read post]
10 Oct 2024, 3:07 pm by William Bly
Probable cause and the accusation of impairment come from the officer’s opinion rather than any empirical evidence. [read post]
1 Jan 2017, 8:58 pm by David Cheifetz
Il est vrai que le juge de première instance n’a pas tenu compte des opinions de ces témoins. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 2:26 pm
In his opinion (issued August 12), Judge Walker writes (those of you with access to Westlaw will be able to use the hyperlinks):The court first considers whether proponents have shown a likelihood of success on the merits of their appeal. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 7:07 am
  The date his suit was filed is not mentioned in the court’s opinion. [read post]