Search for: "In re: Justice v."
Results 9261 - 9280
of 18,118
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2015, 9:41 am
The Family Justice System does not need more bad PR. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 9:41 am
The Family Justice System does not need more bad PR. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 8:55 am
” The social media posts, therefore, did not meet the threshold requirement established by Pickering v. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 5:29 am
See Whren v. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 3:35 am
Exceptional Child Center at the Constitutional Accountability Center’s Text and History Blog, while at PrawfsBlawg Richard Re considers the scenario (noted by Justice Kagan at Tuesday’s argument) in which the federal government’s brief does not include signatures from relevant government agencies. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 2:05 am
Reason highlighted this tidbit from Justice Sotomayor. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 9:56 pm
USA, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 9:18 am
“You’ve got to know what you’re shooting at,” the Chief Justice observed, “before you can tell if you’ve missed. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 8:57 am
” Interestingly, along comes the European Court of Justice with a ruling endorsing (at least in the copyright context) this very test (and, therefore, that unreasonable outcome). [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 7:18 am
One final point, about Terry v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 6:49 am
But yesterday’s oral argument in Williams-Yulee v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 8:57 pm
This is a claim articulated most fully (so far) by Justice Scalia in his brief concurrence in Ricci v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 1:30 pm
Saying that, no, the trial court should have been compelled to put the guy in jail for 28 months; that it wasn't allowed to remove supervision even though the guy will be sent away to another continent.I'll let you read what Justice Aaron -- who's fine with what the trial court did -- says about this, and contrast it to what Justice O'Rourke (who's not okay with it) says about it in his dissent.I'll just add one other, nonlegal, point.I'm… [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 12:22 pm
The case then went back to the district court for a determination of damages – but in the meantime, the Court decided the case of Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 7:01 am
Josh is a huge fan of the 5-4 Bates v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 6:39 am
Justice William Brennan, author of Sherbert v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 2:25 am
by Dennis Crouch In Teva v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 12:12 am
” If you’re still with me, the last relevant theoretical point is that Justice Antonin Scalia has long been leading, within the Court, a re-evaluation of Fourth Amendment doctrine in favor of privacy (and thus often in favor of criminal defendants). [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 11:25 pm
See See v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 10:10 pm
If you're a racist, you're always going to be a racist. [read post]
