Search for: "In re State of Texas" Results 9261 - 9280 of 14,654
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Nov 2011, 4:08 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Morton who're innocent, imprisoned, and have no other hope for salvation.In other words, the state for nearly a decade since Chapter 64 first became law has been having the debate Mr. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 3:13 am by Bob Kraft
"Some patients, when they find out they're pregnant, bam — they're out of here," said Dr. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 2:38 am by Bob Kraft
“Some patients, when they find out they’re pregnant, bam — they’re out of here,” said Dr. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 1:59 am
On February 1, 2003, when the shuttle re-entered earth's atmosphere and broke apart, toxic debris was showered over several east Texas counties, setting off an intensive NASA investigation to determine the true cause of the catastrophe. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 5:05 pm by Jeff Gamso
  Here lie the remains of those the state killed. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 5:05 pm by Jeff Gamso
  Here lie the remains of those the state killed. [read blog]
13 Nov 2011, 4:53 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Texas’ embarrassment of exonerations should be a strong motivation to fall in line.Improved training is another step the state should take. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 3:18 pm by Courtney Minick
Incendiary, a new documentary about the case, is opening across the United States. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 11:55 am by Bexis
 Not surprisingly, the Fifth Circuit, which includes Texas, agrees:[I]n hazarding an Erie guess, our task is to attempt to predict state law, not to create or modify it. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 9:09 pm by Admin
The California Supreme Court is considering this week whether the state broke the law when it used re-development funds to close a shortfall a few years ago, according to the Wall Street Journal. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 12:50 pm by Bexis
App. 1985) (quoting with approval reliance language in Bichler and Batiste).Texas seems to follow the same principle, at least where the implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose is concerned. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 12:13 pm by John Elwood
Texas, 10-10838 (a capital case raising a litany of constitutional violations that has been relisted twice; see here for more). [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 8:11 am by Susan I. Nelson
(reprinted from Arbitrary and Capricious on the Litigation Section of the State Bar of Texas website) [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 5:35 am
#3) Texas #2) Missouri #1) Louisiana So, how do you know if you're properly insured? [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 7:44 pm by Mark Bennett
Here’s Texas’s harmless error rule in criminal cases, Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 44.2: (a)    Constitutional Error. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 12:01 pm by Dennis Crouch
Texas ruling that its patents were invalid and not infringed. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 8:31 am by Lovechilde
(I’ll believe they are when Georgia and Texas start executing them.) [read post]