Search for: "John v. John" Results 9261 - 9280 of 33,735
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jun 2018, 9:26 pm by Anthony Gaughan
Noah Feldman’s superb new book, The Three Lives of James Madison: Genius, Partisan, President, is filled with fascinating insights relevant to contemporary American law and politics. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 5:31 pm by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
Crossing the Line in Voir Dire The Utah Court of Appeals rendered an opinion in State v. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 10:21 am by Sandy Levinson
 I have quoted many times what I believe to be the late John Roche's useful addendum to Lord Acton's famous comment about power and corruption. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 4:35 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
 . has identified a cognizable cause of action but failed to assert a material allegation necessary to support the cause of action” (John R. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
Commentary continues on Collins v. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 2:59 am by Walter Olson
Prosecutors say $32 million staged slip-fall ring drew on services of litigation finance firm [Matthew Goldstein and Jessica Silver-Greenberg, New York Times] Federalist Society podcast previews Frank v. [read post]
31 May 2018, 11:13 am by Adam Feldman
For example, the majority and separate opinions in Jesner v. [read post]
31 May 2018, 5:11 am by Kevin
Let’s try once more, now that the Supreme Court has mentioned it in Collins v. [read post]
30 May 2018, 9:19 am by John Elwood
John Elwood reviews Tuesday’s relists. [read post]
Unsatisfactory rating voided because employee's "performance review," failed to comply with the employer's own procedures and thus undermined the integrity of the process Joyce v City of New York, 2018 NY Slip Op 03433, Appellate Division, First Department The Appellate Division annulled the determination of respondent New York City Department of Education [DOE] sustaining the "unsatisfactory" rating for the 2010-2011 academic year give to John Joyce, a tenured teacher. The court said that the record demonstrates "deficiencies in the performance review process" that resulted in Mr. Joyce being given an unsatisfactory rating for the 2010-2011 academic year. Citing Matter of Gumbs v Board of Educ. of the City Sch. Dist. of the City of N.Y., 125 AD3d 484, and Matter of Richards v Board of Educ. of the City Sch. Dist. of the City of N.Y., 117 AD3d 605, the Appellate Division noted that these deficiencies "were not merely technical, but undermined the integrity and fairness of the process." Mr. Joyce had received a satisfactory rating for the previous academic year and, in contravention of its own procedures, DOE failed to place him on notice that he was in danger of receiving an unsatisfactory rating for the 2010-2011 academic year until after April 28, 2011. Although DOE's procedures required that tenured teachers in danger of receiving an unsatisfactory rating have "formal observations including a pre-observation and post-observation conference by the principal ... as part of a prescriptive plan to improve their teaching," Mr. Joyce received only one formal observation which took place one week before the end of the academic year and was not part of a prescriptive plan to improve his performance as a teacher. The decision is posted on the Internet at: http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2018/2018_03433.htm
30 May 2018, 4:37 am by Public Employment Law Press
Citing Matter of Gumbs v Board of Educ. of the City Sch. [read post]
29 May 2018, 1:17 pm by Rory Little
” Finally, the statements at issue were viewed as “compelled” only by application of a 1967 employment-law decision (Garrity v. [read post]