Search for: "Mark" Results 9261 - 9280 of 151,856
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Aug 2012, 2:33 am by John L. Welch
In short, Applicant appropriated the dominant portion of registrant’s mark. [read post]
2 Jan 2007, 5:13 pm
Before you check, you might want to know (or you might not) that the TTAB just reversed a refusal to register the mark DPOF on the Supplemental Register, finding the mark to be capable of functioning as a trademark for digital cameras and related goods. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 5:00 am
In yet another case involving the doctrine of foreign equivalents, the Board affirmed a Section 2(d) refusal to register the mark LA PEREGRINA, finding it likely to cause confusion with the registered mark PILGRIM, both for jewelry. [read post]
31 Mar 2007, 2:18 am
The alleged mark STEELBUILDING.COM has surfaced again, this time in altered guise. [read post]
20 Oct 2006, 2:32 pm
  While the Creamery did not object, the PTO rejected the application because the mark was confusingly similar to the Creamery's TILLAMOOK mark. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 2:39 pm by Meg Tierney (US)
Home Chef began using its HC Home Mark and Home Chef Home Logo (collectively, the “HC Marks”) in 2014 in connection with meal preparation kits. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 2:46 am by John L. Welch
" The Board reasonably concluded that the implicit reference to "bacon" in Opposer's mark did not detract from the similarity of the marks in sound and meaning.The marks are used in connection with identical products that travel in the same channels of trade to the same classes of consumers. [read post]
4 May 2010, 7:04 pm by Josh
False marking "includes marking unpatented product as “patented” or marking a product as 'patent pending' when no patent is pending. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 10:24 pm
" Sunland's assertion that Registrant uses its mark in an "inconspicuous manner on its packaging" was inappropriate, since Registrant's rights in its mark cannot be restricted based on applicant's assertions as to how the mark is used, nor can the marks at issue be distinguished based on how Applicant uses its mark.Sunland oddly contended that the marks would be pronounced differently, but as the Board has proclaimed many… [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 5:42 am by Glenn Reynolds
MARK STEYN: ANARCHISTS FOR BIG GOVERNMENT. “Underneath the familiar props of radical chic that hasn’t been either radical or chic in half a century, the zombie youth of the Big Sloth movement are a ludicrous paradox.” This parody, seen on Facebook, says it all . . . [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 4:12 pm by war
On the question of use as a trade mark, it is permissible. [read post]
31 May 2009, 3:16 am
The trade mark does not contain a sign that is a geographical indication for the purposes of the Act. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 7:39 am by Glenn Reynolds
BITTER: NYT’s Mark Bittman comes to Madison to talk about food and greenness… and insults Scott Walker. “What exactly is ‘rightfully ours’ here? [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 6:16 am by The Docket Navigator
In granting defendant's motion to transfer venue of plaintiff's qui tam false marking action, the court rejected plaintiff's arguments that convenience factors favored retaining jurisdiction. [read post]
25 Sep 2020, 12:34 pm by Shepherd Smith Edwards & Kantas, LLP
Continue Reading › The post Florida Retiree Loses Money in GPB Private Placements & REITs While Under Supervision Of CFG Capital Management Advisor Mark Cline appeared first on Investor Lawyers Blog. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 5:55 am by Rebecca Tushnet
A later notice of cancellation, for the “DRX 9000” word mark, came after the entry of judgment, when the marks had been reassigned to Axiom. [read post]