Search for: "No Named Defendant" Results 9261 - 9280 of 57,355
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Oct 2020, 12:00 pm by John Floyd
These plea deals may have also involved a provision to have the registration removed from a defendant’s record. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 6:14 am by Lindsay C. Demaree
The named plaintiff in Johnson alleged, on behalf of himself and a putative class, that defendant NPAS Solutions, LLC violated the TCPA by using an automatic telephone dialing system to call cell phone numbers that had been reassigned to a non-consenting consumer. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 4:38 pm by INFORRM
  The presumption of falsity in libel claims means that it would be for a defendant (i.e. the publisher) to prove the individual was not exempt – which could be impossible. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 2:35 pm by Kevin
It starts like this: The jurors for our sovereign lord the king, upon their oath, present, that an open and public war, on the 11th day of January, in the 20th year of the reign of our sovereign lord George the Third, by the grace of God, of Great-Britain, France, and Ireland, king, defender of the faith, and so forth, and long before and ever since hitherto by land and by sea was, and yet is carried on and prosecuted by Lewis the French king against our most serene, illustrious, and… [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 9:09 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Clif suggested that, knowing the truth, named plaintiffs can now just read the nutrition label. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 9:00 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Sept. 25, 2020) A remand because the district court wrongly excluded one survey in this false advertising case (though didn’t abuse its discretion in excluding another), then granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 8:58 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Kroeger’) – a well-respected talent scout – and/or pretending to be affiliated with her; and (c) using, unlawfully and without authorization, Adore Me’s name, trademark, and reputation to obtain nude and intimate photographs from women. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 8:53 am by Eric Goldman
Section 230(c)(2)(A) protects removing “harassing” content, but that doesn’t apply to attacks directed at groups, not individuals doxxing, like deadnaming trans people schoolyard name-calling and similar incivilities junk science/conspiracy theories, like anti-vax content or quack COVID19 cures. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 7:08 am by Dan Filler
Our first graduate was Betty Trier Berry, who became the first woman in the United States to serve in a public defender's office—before women were permitted to vote in federal elections. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 9:05 pm by Dan Flynn
    The USDA leadership does not think the union plaintiffs, including specific individuals named, are even qualified to bring the case. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Naming a white supremacist group, Trump said “Proud Boys, stand back and stand by. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 6:13 pm by Anna Salvatore, Benjamin Wittes
When the prosecutor and defendant agree on a dismissal, he contends, there is no longer an Article III controversy, and the case no longer can be heard in court. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 4:10 pm
Only in that way, can we defend ourselves against regrets … which can be very hard to shake. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 12:59 pm by Jacob Schulz, Margaret Taylor
And the report spends many pages incoherently defending against criticisms in the minority staff report. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 12:54 pm by Randee Iles and Rebecca Guidry
Additional Party Names: Barry Scott Carline, Bayou Lafourche Fresh Water Dist., Energy Transfer Partners, ‘Katherine Aaslestad, Louisiana Dep’t of Envtl. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 12:54 pm by Randee Iles and Rebecca Guidry
Additional Party Names: Barry Scott Carline, Bayou Lafourche Fresh Water Dist., Energy Transfer Partners, ‘Katherine Aaslestad, Louisiana Dep’t of Envtl. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 4:17 am by SHG
Griffin was unnecessarily harsh, and when confronted about her behavior, would defend it by arguing that WSN’s staff is too immature to accept critique. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 7:36 pm by Shea Denning
The appellate court further explained that the district court below “transgressed a fundamental Fourth Amendment doctrine not revoked by Carpenter,” namely “that what one knowingly exposes to public view does not invoke reasonable expectations of privacy protected by the Fourth Amendment. [read post]