Search for: "Plaintiff(s)"
Results 9261 - 9280
of 178,514
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2017, 7:48 am
The land court, having seen the area, did not credit the plaintiff’s claim that he would drive his VW Jetta over the entire path. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 9:17 am
The judge denied the plaintiff’s request, and then he appealed. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 4:43 pm
The key issue was whether the defendant’s negligence caused the plaintiff’s injury. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 10:00 pm
Case Summary In this workplace injury case related to the plaintiff’s employment with a shipping company, the plaintiff...Read the whole entry... [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 1:08 pm
There's another district court case which went beyond this and held that a plaintiff had to satisfy the "actual fraud" standard in order to successfully assert a spam claim under state law (Reunion). [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 4:30 am
Workers' compensation laws get rewritten, reinterpreted, are the subject of politics and distorted through administrative regulation.And when a state's workers' compensation laws come in conflict with Newton's Laws of Physics, it's a huge fight ...Sir Isaac NewtonIt's no secret that I have been of the opinion that workers' compensation is in trouble, not just in California, but across the nation, because in my observation the… [read post]
20 May 2021, 4:00 am
In its decision the court referred to an affidavit submitted by NYCTA's Director of Employment Operations for Human Resources indicating that NYCTA had reviewed the recommendation letters and certificates submitted by Plaintiff in support of his reemployment by NYCTA but had decided not to re-employ Plaintiff after considering all of the relevant factors including:[1] The duties and role of the position Plaintiff was seeking;[2]… [read post]
20 May 2021, 4:00 am
In its decision the court referred to an affidavit submitted by NYCTA's Director of Employment Operations for Human Resources indicating that NYCTA had reviewed the recommendation letters and certificates submitted by Plaintiff in support of his reemployment by NYCTA but had decided not to re-employ Plaintiff after considering all of the relevant factors including:[1] The duties and role of the position Plaintiff was seeking;[2]… [read post]
15 May 2014, 6:55 am
It's also difficult to do this when the plaintiff has bad performance evaluations. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 4:47 am
The altercation arose over a disagreement regarding the Plaintiff’s daughter attending bible school. [read post]
25 Nov 2011, 9:09 am
In this week’s case (Burgess v. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 5:00 am
” Further, Plaintiff’s vocational rehabilitation counselor indicated that he could not verify whether Plaintiff is employable without having a physician’s medical release. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 3:22 pm
The court denied the plaintiff’s motion, after which he appealed. [read post]
14 May 2007, 9:33 pm
This was an application by the Defendant, Axa Insurance ("Axa"), seeking an Order pursuant to Rule 21.01(1)(b) striking out the Plaintiff’s claim on the grounds that it disclosed no reasonable cause of action, as the Plaintiff, Ms. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 9:56 am
The Plaintiff’s Mother’s Health Declined Quickly after Moving into the Nursing Home The case of Johnson v. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 1:22 pm
In ruling against the plaintiff, the court cited the state’s “recreational use statute. [read post]
16 May 2016, 7:30 am
Defense counsel flagged the issue of plaintiff’s social media accounts early, warning plaintiff’s counsel that plaintiff’s social media accounts would be scrutinized and that she should be warned about “spoilage” [sic]. [read post]
26 Dec 2012, 1:57 pm
Addressing the “suitable seating” issue at Kmart’s Tulare, California store, the court rejected plaintiffs’ counsel’s arguments that Kmart was required to redesign its cashier and bagging areas in order to provide seats. [read post]
13 May 2010, 5:30 am
(Editors' Note: See the CAFA Law Blog analysis of the Seventh Circuit's decision in First Bank v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 3:26 pm
In asbestos cases, Maryland courts consider whether the plaintiff’s exposure to an asbestos-containing product was a substantial factor in the development of the plaintiff’s injury. [read post]
