Search for: "Powers v. Powers"
Results 9261 - 9280
of 55,740
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Apr 2018, 4:00 am
In Acosta v. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 9:08 am
Doe v. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 8:13 am
The Court of Appeals disagrees.The case is Jewish People for the Betterment of Westhampton Beach v. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 5:22 am
The case is Northampton Area School District v. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 10:51 am
Mark Hood was the expert engineer hired by Personal Injury Lawyer Lance Copper in Melton v. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 8:30 am
"Rights in Exile Newsletter, no. 61 (July 2015) [full-text]- News and information for refugee legal aid providers.Third World Quarterly, vol. 36, no. 6 (2015) [contents]- Special issue on "The power of human rights/the human rights of power. [read post]
7 Jan 2018, 7:30 am
The Supreme Court dismissed the role of states in a footnote in Gonzales v. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 4:10 pm
See Childs v. [read post]
20 Dec 2014, 5:37 pm
These essentially provide the government with the power to compulsorily acquire a licence to use a patented invention in the course of providing services to the public.People in some parts of the world regard such compulsory acquisition provisions as an unconscionable imposition on the rights of a patent holder. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 7:28 am
Constitution, and that Duka therefore had established a likelihood of success on the merits of her case (Duka v. [read post]
27 May 2015, 4:25 pm
So, I am cheating and calling an action of the United States Supreme Court a "ruling," which it technically is.Yesterday, the Supreme Court denied the petition for certiorari in Shadadpuri v. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 6:48 am
On September 12, 2013, the Supreme Court of Canada issued its decision in Payette v. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 4:15 am
Yesterday in American Humanist Association v. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 1:53 pm
If DOJ cannot exercise its power to invoke recidivist enhancements in drug trafficking cases less destructively and less brutally, it doesn’t deserve to have the power at all.And here's the entire order:US v Kupa Statement of Reasons Final [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 4:00 am
"Article 75 of the CPLR provides that an arbitration award may be vacated if the court finds that the rights of a party were prejudiced by (1) corruption, fraud, or misconduct in procuring the award; (2) partiality of an arbitrator; (3) the arbitrator exceeded his or her power; or (4) the arbitrator failed to follow the procedures mandated by Article 75. [read post]
21 Aug 2017, 6:30 am
”—Peter Charles Hoffer, author of Rutgers v. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 1:27 pm
In United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2019, 8:26 am
Insights from the Sanctions Case," Bobby Chesney Chapter 5: "Huawei Technology v. [read post]
6 Apr 2022, 9:01 am
” The Supreme Court recently heard oral argument in Torres v. [read post]
1 May 2013, 7:53 am
Last August, we reported that a Pennsylvania Superior Court decision (Butler v. [read post]
