Search for: "STATE v COUNTS"
Results 9261 - 9280
of 17,260
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Nov 2013, 3:26 am
In the end, United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 5:40 pm
Even if the government’s translation-as-material-support theory were factually insufficient, we would not reverse: the defendant’s convictions on the affected counts are independently supported by the mass of evidence surrounding the Yemen trip and, under Griffin [v. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 1:54 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 8:40 pm
See Cooper v. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 1:39 pm
The final act, at least until the appeals, of the United States v. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 12:05 pm
See United States v. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 2:04 am
People v. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court case of Automobile Workers v. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 7:17 am
Sys., Inc. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 5:53 am
AC34385 - State v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 10:39 am
The question in Rosemond v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 10:11 am
J & J Sports states that it is the exclusive domestic commercial distributor of the Manny Pacquiao v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 5:00 am
State Farm Fire Gen. [read post]
10 Nov 2013, 9:09 pm
The Supreme Court, in the case of Burrage v. [read post]
10 Nov 2013, 11:03 am
The court notes that this state has no statutory definition of an accomplice. [read post]
9 Nov 2013, 6:15 pm
(And it stays there).United States v. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 2:00 pm
Remanded.Read more: Top state court says woman who donated egg to female partner has parental rightsState v. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 8:57 am
You can't pick and choose what parts count and which parts don't count." [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 6:26 am
The judge dismissed counts 7, 26 and 27; the jury convicted Mebrtatu “ of counts one, two through six, eight through 20, 24-25, 28-34, and 36-38” and found her not guilty “of counts 21-23, and 35. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 2:39 pm
In United States v.Conrad Clinton Blair, No. 12-4427, the Court rejects an expansive reading of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Descamps v. [read post]
