Search for: "State v. Johns" Results 9261 - 9280 of 19,774
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Aug 2022, 8:06 am by John Floyd
 Writing for the Court’s majority, Chief Justice John Marshall, an influential Federalist advocate, stated that the Bill of Rights amendments “contain no expression indicating an intention to apply them to the State governments. [read post]
28 Dec 2019, 9:51 pm by Guest
By 1941, the pro-New Deal Court took this line, saying in United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 3:36 pm
On September 23, 2009, the Pennsylvania Superior Court handed down a monumental UIM decision in the case of Pusl v. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 7:14 am by Amy Howe
In a footnote in their opinion in Trinity Lutheran Church v. [read post]
20 Jun 2010, 11:52 am
The “long-standing and frequently-invoked constitutional prohibition against the use of public moneys for private purposes (New York State Constitution, Article VIII, Section 1);”2. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 6:59 am by Amy Howe
One phrase that came up several times at Tuesday’s oral argument in Maples v. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 8:50 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
Fornelli issued a decision in the post-Koken case of Gravatt v. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 4:19 am
Yesterday, the NJ Supreme Court published their ruling in Devaney v. [read post]
17 May 2023, 3:49 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
 . strictly limited; the court is not allowed to render a determination upon a thorough review of the relevant facts adduced by both parties, but rather is substantially more constrained in its review, examining only the plaintiff’s pleadings and affidavits” (Carr v Wegmans Food Mkts., Inc., 182 AD3d 667, 668 [3d Dept 2020]; see John R. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 11:19 am by Jason Rantanen
DC and the New Need to Eliminate Federal Patent Law Preemption of State and Local Price and Product Regulation, 2007 Patently-O Patent L.J. 30 (Download Sarnoff.BIO.pdf) John F. [read post]
30 Jun 2024, 3:00 am by jonathanturley
Below is my column in the Hill on the Supreme Court decision on Friday in Fischer v. [read post]