Search for: "State v. L. A. T." Results 9261 - 9280 of 9,945
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 May 2008, 3:04 pm
  The complaint is filled with language that suggests that the issue of what constitutes acceptable fair use is settled law, and contends that the state's guide to understanding copyright - developed by a committee of experienced lawyers and educators, including the late and sorely missed L. [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
: (Class 46), ICANN on cost to end domain tasting: (Class 46), ICANN can’t – but can you? [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 1:25 pm
Over the weekend, we reported that the Association of Justices of the Supreme Court of the State of New York had corresponded with Ann T. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:00 am
: (Patent Docs), US: Supreme Court declines to hear final Nucleonics’ appeal in gene-silencing patent dispute with Benitec Australia: (IP Law360), (Therapeutics Daily), US: 505(b)(2) drug approvals rock - Interaction of patents and exclusivity of drugs approved by FDA under section 505(b)(2): (Patent Baristas), US: StemCells’ patents survive reexam – StemCells and Neuralstem differ on extent of changes: (Patent Docs), US: StemCells announces issuance of… [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 10:00 am
" [24] The state expressly states that such a user may not have not have protection within the laws of Michigan, unless there is a state or federal statute that expressly requires a manufacturer to warn. [25] Other states have also chosen to adopt the doctrine. [read post]
19 Apr 2008, 8:50 am
Aren't we labor-intensive businesses, not capital intensive (A: As currently conceived, we are. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 5:00 am
It seems like you just can't get a second bite of the apple when you want one.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:00 am
Protecting computer programs under the Copyright Act: Dais Studios v Bullet Creative: (IP Down Under), Assessing copyright risk in new classroom technologies: (IP Down Under), Cadbury loses battle over exclusive use of colour purple for chocolate wrapping in its case against Darrell Lea: (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog), (IP Down Under), (IPKat), (IPwar’s), Employee or independent contractor? [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 10:39 am
L'Oreal USA, Inc., 458 F.3d 244, 256 n. 5 (3d Cir. 2006). [read post]