Search for: "State v. Losee"
Results 9261 - 9280
of 14,205
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2012, 3:10 am
Plaintiffs have a possibility of losing the property in the Federal Court Action, having the sale of the property rescinded and losing the $4.8 million apartment. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 2:45 am
Here are the noteworthy posts of the week: Trade Secret and Covenant Not to Compete Posts, Cases and Articles: In the latest high profile battle over which state's law should apply (i.e., California v. every other state), sports agent Aaron Mintz is battling his former employer Priority Sports & Entertainment over the enforceability of his non-compete. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 9:01 pm
United States. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 4:27 pm
Dukes; Losing the Battle, But Winning the War: Negotiating a Favorable Conditional Certification "Class" Definition, Notice and Protocols during the notice period; Maximizing Discovery Tools for Decertification and Preventing Ultimate Certification; Opposing Rule 23 Class Certification of State Law Claims in Hybrid Cases Following a Ruling on Conditional Certification of the FLSA Collective Claim. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 1:22 pm
Henry the Sixth in infant bands crowned King Whose state so many had the managing That they lost France and made his England bleed. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 11:41 am
Inc. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 10:55 am
The Fifth District Court of Appeals in Florida - the appeals court covering the north/central part of the State, recently decided T.M.H. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 4:20 am
Having it Both Ways: the USPTO’s Inconsistent Positions in In re Lovin and Kappos v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 2:00 pm
Instead, my clients could plead guilty to the felonies and would “only” lose the ability to ever vote again, among other things. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 1:59 pm
This conclusion is at odds with one reached by the Eighth Circuit in Sasser v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 1:03 pm
Medeiros et al., v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 11:22 am
Meras v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 7:22 am
.; the one exception being United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:11 pm
Shareholders only risk losing the initial investment in the corporation. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 1:48 pm
He’s probably right, but he loses anyway. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 7:05 am
Beloit Corp. v. [read post]
Oklahoma Supreme Court Reverses Foreclosure Judgment in 'Show Me The Note' Case - U.S. Bank v. Moore
23 Apr 2012, 6:34 am
Bank v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 6:04 am
Plaintiff, contends that defendant chose not to get a college degree or pursue a career, and that, while he supported her various business projects, the projects failed or she would quit after losing interest. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 1:27 pm
The case is, Service Lloyds Insurance Company v. [read post]
21 Apr 2012, 8:31 am
" The case, Medlen v. [read post]
