Search for: "State v. So"
Results 9261 - 9280
of 117,804
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jun 2022, 8:36 am
Khary Penebaker et al v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 12:49 pm
In the visualization above, the root or sink node is the famed United States Supreme Court decision Marbury v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 12:26 am
Co. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 3:14 pm
Friedland, 450 So.2d 905, 906 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984) (citing White v. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 9:20 am
Johnson v. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 11:52 am
If that is so, that would ordinarily mean that the same should be true at the state level. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 7:51 am
Federal and state antidiscrimination statutes are not exempted. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 12:37 pm
July 30, 2008) (applying TwIqbal; state “pleading requirements, so far as they are concerned with the degree of detail to be alleged, are irrelevant in federal court”).The argument that state law trumps TwIqbal in a removed action was found “completely without merit” in Heffley v. [read post]
11 Sep 2007, 3:05 am
Nordike, now Holcomb v. [read post]
21 Apr 2012, 12:25 pm
McKeegan v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 10:03 am
Finally, the Board says that the Secretary of State for Justice should be made a party to proceedings like the present (because the Secretary of State is the other party before the Board) and so one answer would be for the Secretary of State to be made liable for the costs. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 6:11 am
Gonzalez v. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 12:58 pm
Taggart wasn't supposed to leave Kern County (or the state).Which, of course, he subsequently did. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 12:39 pm
I can see why the Ninth Circuit's so inclined. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 8:00 am
So Mr. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 4:30 pm
The brief is of course a court document above all, but it also bears on oversight—perhaps more so in this particular context. [read post]
30 May 2018, 2:06 pm
The United States Supreme Court held yesterday in Collins v. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 2:33 am
It also stated that assisted return was being pursued. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 5:30 am
Race-based restrictions on marriage have been illegal for, oh, 42 years now, since the Supreme Court's decision in Loving v. [read post]
19 May 2011, 5:51 pm
United States v. [read post]
