Search for: "State v. State" Results 9261 - 9280 of 258,425
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Oct 2023, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
The Texas Supreme Court yesterday heard oral arguments (video of full oral arguments) in Hensley v. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 11:00 pm
Their verified complaint alleges that plaintiff [B] was walking in front of defendant's property when she tripped and fell on a defective sidewalk condition, sustaining injuries, and plaintiff stated in her verification that these allegations were true to her own personal knowledge. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 10:26 pm by Frank Cranmer
That right might therefore be overridden by a state body, provided there was a sufficiently pressing need to do so for one of the purposes in Article 9(2) and the means used were both lawful and proportionate, applying the four-stage proportionality test in Bank Mellat v Her Majesty’s Treasury (No 2) (SC(E)) [2014] AC 700 [at 20] and allowing the state body an appropriate discretionary area of judgment. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 7:17 pm by Michael Lowe
Automated Medical Laboratories, Inc., 770 F.2d 399, 407 (4th Cir. 1985) and United States v. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 4:44 pm by INFORRM
  Nicklin J stated that “(i) The statement must be recognisable as comment, as distinct from an imputation of fact. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 4:29 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
To be sure, the purpose of the IFR is to seek to comply with a 2021 Supreme Court decision, United States v. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 12:11 pm by Mark Ashton
These are the ones that are supposed to come wrapped in IRS Form 709; the United States Gift Tax Return. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 10:42 am by Christopher Ernst
  The Supreme Court of the United States, in so far as the FAA is concerned, changed that in Morgan v. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 8:00 am
., LLC, doing business as “Library Hotel,” is said to have violated federal law because it refused to accommodate a disabled employee (who suffered from musculoskeletal impairments) because it declined that individual’s request to sit at a stool while working at the front desk and also refused a request to limit walking.Faced with those impediments, the employee was reportedly compelled to resign.Believing that such conduct violated the ADA, the United States Equal… [read post]