Search for: "State v. Weeks"
Results 9261 - 9280
of 42,070
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Apr 2012, 1:07 pm
The EPA's retreat appears to have been prompted by the Supreme Court's unanimous decision against the Agency the week before in Sackett v. [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 7:58 pm
For the reasons stated below, we reverse the district court with respect to the claims against Vaughn, but affirm summary judgment in favor of Lincoln. 07a0103p.06 2007/03/16 In Re: Renato Acosta v. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 1:18 pm
The new term is already full of interesting cases, including the very first one on Monday, October 7: Kahler v. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 10:39 pm
Kearns , a Democrat who served as Chair of the USITC from mid-2020 until three weeks ago, stated that he would affirm the implied-waiver finding with respect to one of the four patents-in-suit but takes no position on the other three.Implied waiver is specific to this case and has no bearing on Ericsson v. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 11:36 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2023, 11:41 am
The approval is in defiance of the US Supreme Court ruling in Allen v. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 5:39 pm
AK Steel’s coke plant in Ashland, KY was alleged to have violated the plant’s Title V permit and the KY State Implementation Plan. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 5:39 pm
AK Steel’s coke plant in Ashland, KY was alleged to have violated the plant’s Title V permit and the KY State Implementation Plan. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 5:39 pm
AK Steel’s coke plant in Ashland, KY was alleged to have violated the plant’s Title V permit and the KY State Implementation Plan. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 3:04 pm
See also United States v. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 9:38 pm
Highlights this week included: Spain rejects ‘US influenced’ copyright bill (1709 Copyright Blog) (EFF) (Ars Technica) (TorrentFreak) Tessera wins at CAFC – eBay factors irrelevant to ITC exclusion orders: Spansion et al v ITC, Tessera (IPBiz) (Patents Post-Grant) (ITC 337 Update) Please join the discussion by adding your comments on any of these stories, and please do let us know if you think we’ve missed something important, or if there is a source you… [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 3:17 am
Cubatabaco v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 4:55 am
Braun Melsungen AG, et. al. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 5:59 am
Thompkins.In State v. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 10:18 am
Today, the Court will hear argument in Gomez-Perez v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 2:01 pm
Today is the 50th anniversary of Gideon v. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 10:22 am
As noted above, the responsibility of the state to provide exculpatory evidence to the defense was articulated in the 1963 Supreme Court ruling in Brady v. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:00 am
(Please accept our apologies that it is a little late this week.) [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 8:49 am
Dunn won in State v. [read post]
