Search for: "The State Bar Court of the State Bar of California"
Results 9261 - 9280
of 11,378
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2007, 1:08 am
Court
Daily Business Review
Saying a bankruptcy judge was "a few french fries short of a Happy Meal" may cost an out-of-state lawyer the ability to practice in U.S. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 8:18 pm
Unlike other bar groups, it does not take a position on any issue. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 9:36 am
California – Highlighting Democratic Losses, Republicans Block California Campaign Finance Bill Sacramento Bee – Jeremy White | Published: 3/17/2014 California Democrats’ loss of a legislative supermajority stifled their push to change the state’s campaign finance law. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 3:54 pm
Superior Court Judge Richard King gave her the maximum sentence: three years behind bars for the felony, one year for the misdemeanor. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 12:51 am
California 370 U.S. 660 (1962). [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 6:00 am
Thus, a Court injunction would not have necessarily barred such disclosure. [read post]
13 Jun 2021, 5:47 am
But even if there is no question whether the plaintiff is in fact able to file his complaint in state court, there is still the question of why the plaintiff has chosen to file in state rather than federal court. [read post]
10 Dec 2016, 7:17 pm
Pendleton (Former District Court Judge) New Email: afpendleton@gmail.com Source: CEBblog, SnapChat as Evidence, Julie Brook, October 12, 2016, State Bar of California. [read post]
31 May 2018, 7:43 am
Earlier this month, a California district court denied both parties’ motions for summary judgment and found that a “multitude of factual disputes” barred judgment as a matter of law for either side. [read post]
15 May 2023, 11:27 am
The court, however, indicated it would revisit the issue following discovery. [read post]
10 Jan 2015, 12:24 pm
California held that a state may not ban vulgarity (there, “Fuck,” in “Fuck the Draft”). [read post]
19 May 2020, 1:52 pm
California, 19-532Issue: Whether provisions of California law that, with certain limited exceptions, prohibit state law-enforcement officials from providing federal immigration authorities with release dates and other information about individuals subject to federal immigration enforcement, and restrict the transfer of aliens in state custody to federal immigration custody, are preempted by federal law or barred by intergovernmental immunity. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 2:11 pm
Not all contract terms, however, are expressly stated in a contract. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 7:42 pm
Accordingly, despite his participation in the criminal conduct he has today acknowledged, I am nevertheless hopeful and confident that the Court will recognize Mel Weiss to be one of the true legal giants of his generation and a consummate humanitarian whose contributions to the Bar and the world community have been nothing short of spectacular. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 2:03 pm
Accordingly, despite his participation in the criminal conduct he has today acknowledged, I am nevertheless hopeful and confident that the Court will recognize Mel Weiss to be one of the true legal giants of his generation and a consummate humanitarian whose contributions to the Bar and the world community have been nothing short of spectacular. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 4:30 am
Arizona, we're simultaneously seeing this administration insist that state court juries should exercise dominion over interstate commerce already fully regulated by the federal government. [read post]
13 Sep 2021, 11:36 am
The court also noted my exchange with then-California AG Becerra (now head of HHS). [read post]
26 Nov 2020, 1:18 am
But under this Court's precedents, it does not suffice for a State to point out that, as compared to houses of w [read post]
22 Aug 2007, 1:27 am
Plaintiffs Bar Eyes Big False Claims Case
The Recorder
Seeing the potential for billion-dollar damages, lawyers who sue over government contracts are watching a false claims suit against the University of Phoenix, which a federal judge in California has cleared for trial. [read post]
31 May 2024, 2:08 pm
The Court’s unanimous opinion gets it right: “[A] government official cannot do indirectly what she is barred from doing directly… [she] cannot coerce a private party to punish or suppress disfavored speech on her behalf. [read post]
