Search for: "United States v. Burden"
Results 9261 - 9280
of 9,844
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2008, 3:34 pm
The United States District Court for the Central District of California found that the plaintiffs had failed to adequately plead scienter under the PSLRA. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 1:15 pm
Baumbast and R v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Case C-413/99) [2002] ECR I-7091 However: Baumbast concerned people who were self-sufficient, without specifically referring to or addressing the fact. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 10:56 am
Schooner Harbor Ventures v. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 8:48 am
For those interested, here are petitioner's opening brief, respondents' brief, and the brief of the United States as amicus supporting petitioners. [read post]
13 Apr 2008, 1:15 pm
" I think that parents have had a veto over grandparent visitation since the United States Supreme Court handed down the Troxel decision. [read post]
13 Apr 2008, 5:03 am
The consequentialist version of imperfect procedural justice finds substantial support in the decisions of the Supreme Court that interpret the Due Process Clauses of the United States Constitution. [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 9:20 pm
United States v. [read post]
9 Apr 2008, 5:49 am
That omission doesn't bother us.The court cited with approval an earlier state court case in which the defendant sold a skeleton truck to a company that then installed a refrigeration unit on the chasis. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 12:39 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) Terri Cole v. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 9:47 am
Inc. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 8:05 am
F-1 students generally are not authorized to work in the United States during the term of their educational program, with limited exceptions. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 7:35 am
As Judge Weinstein notes: Those who would limit the powers historically exercised by juries must now consider the Supreme Court’s Booker-Apprendi line of sentencing decisions, see United States v. [read post]
6 Apr 2008, 12:23 pm
- Ticketmaster Corp. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 1:44 pm
The question presented is: When a defense of invalidity under Section 282 rests on documentary evidence that was not considered by the United States Patent and Trademark Office, whether the factual predicates of the defense must be proved by “clear and convincing evidence” or some lower burden of proof. [read post]
2 Apr 2008, 8:30 am
United Trans. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 9:57 am
In Tafas v. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 9:32 am
Dudas and the United States Patent and Trademark Office and their agents, servants, and employees are permanently enjoined from implementing the Final Rules” Notes: The court made no attempt to carve-out portions of the rules that may be legal. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 8:27 am
John Dudas and the United States Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 7:38 am
Dudas and the United States Patent and Trademark Office):"Today's ruling enjoining the PTO from implementing its controversial rules on continuations and claims is a sound decision that reflects the concerns we expressed in our amicus brief. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 4:52 pm
In United States v. [read post]
