Search for: "United States v. Good" Results 9261 - 9280 of 21,068
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Feb 2024, 12:30 pm by John Ross
In the standoff between Texas and the United States gov't over Gov. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 3:57 pm by Wolfgang Demino
§ 1692a(6).In Henson, the United States Supreme Court specified that it would only determine whether the defendant was a debt collector pursuant to the second definition of section 1692a(6), i.e., whether the "statutory language defining the term `debt collector' [] embrace[s] anyone who `regularly collects or attempts to collect . . . debts owed or due . . . another.'" 137 S. [read post]
20 May 2011, 9:23 am by Kiera Flynn
” Gun rights groups have filed an amicus brief in support of the federal government’s petition for certiorari in United States v. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 3:52 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
To strengthen legal protections for American Indian people that disrupt these government interventions, like ICWA, is to realize reproductive rights more fully in the United States. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 7:18 am by Nabiha Syed
United States continues this week. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 11:35 am by Jeff Foust
On the surface of it, it appears that there’s a good probability of some kind of sanctions violation. [read post]
1 Nov 2012, 4:18 pm by Antonin I. Pribetic
The Plaintiffs sued the Defendants in  the United States for damages for the wrongful death of the late Ms. [read post]
25 May 2020, 10:30 am by Guest Blogger
The deal’s predictably less good for minorities because the bargaining’s done in a locked unit. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 10:26 am by Somil Trivedi
United States, about what prior acts can trigger overly harsh federal sentences for gun possession. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 7:59 am by Kate Howard
Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit’s reasoning in United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 11:21 am by Christa Culver
BP America Production Co.Docket: 10-890Issue(s): Given a constantly present massive inventory of goods bound for interstate commerce, does the fact that individual units of those goods are "in transit" result in the goods being exempt from local taxation under the dormant Commerce Clause? [read post]