Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF: T. S."
Results 9281 - 9300
of 182,503
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jul 2023, 10:36 am
S. 614 (1973), as “[t]he leading precedent” in this area and said that it stands for the proposition that no one has “a judicially cognizable interest” in the prosecution of another person. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 6:58 am
The State Department’s reciprocity schedule for the People’s Republic of China , for example, indicates that an H-1B visa will only be issued for 12 months. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 6:54 am
That’s J U S T IS , of course, a play on the word justice. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 6:41 am
Against this backdrop 733.702(4)(b) tells us plaintiffs aren’t subject to the statute of limitations for probate claims if you’re only suing the decedent’s estate “to establish liability that is protected by the [decedent’s] casualty insurance,” and if your claim is limited exclusively to “the limits of [the decedent’s] casualty insurance protection only. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 6:30 am
This typically involves filing a claim with the other driver’s insurance carrier or your carrier if the driver doesn’t have insurance. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 5:28 am
As other scholars have noted, Amy Coney Barrett filed an interesting concurrence in the student loans decision. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 5:10 am
Still, polling about such decisions can be interesting. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 5:02 am
As a dad, it’s important to understand how insurance companies work and how to protect your family’s interests. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 4:42 am
He responded, “Don’t you know? [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 4:05 am
Accordingly, Liberty viewed her as an official “messenger” of its faith...If a court imposes a minister on a congregation that doesn’t want her—even if the court does so based on employment-law principles—it nonetheless impinges on the church’s religious interest in choosing who speaks for it....Skirting the ministerial exception by dismissing an employment-discrimination claim on its merits forces us to inquire into the… [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 4:00 am
Liberman, Educational Permutations: The Church's Canon Law as Inspiration for Changes to Education Regulation, [Abstract], 35 Regent University law Review 257-294 (2023).Mallory B. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 3:09 am
Though I can’t say why the doctors chose the path they did, my guess is that even if they did plead and prove shareholder oppression based on the Practice’s failure to redeem their shares in retirement, a court bound to consider remedies less drastic than dissolution might consider a redemption in accordance with past practices. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 2:53 am
Jamelle Bouie raises a very interesting point from Justice Elena Kagan’s dissent in Biden v. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 1:17 am
The description of the product sounds like it is rather expensive, so it's unclear why that SME couldn't afford WiFi. [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
The court described the decree as “fair, reasonable, and in the public interest. [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 6:06 pm
The basic thrust of the provisions may be summarized as follows:Chapter 1 General Principles; Articles 1-11The first articles set out the object of CEL-PRC ("to strengthen counter-espionage efforts, to prevent, stop and punish acts of espionage, to preserve national security, and to protect the people's interests" article 1); to place the Communist Party at the core of such efforts (Article 2), and to align counter-espionage efforts with law,… [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 4:12 pm
Resolve Equipment, Inc., 2023 WL 4186395 (S.D.Fla. 2023) contains an interesting fact pattern that touches upon this issue. [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 3:46 pm
Noting the need “[t]o guard against unwarranted interference with corporate elections or stockholder votes in contests for corporate control . . .. [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 6:30 am
This fact by itself doesn't justify constitutionalism-- it just suggests that it's hard to excise at least some aspects of constitutionalism from a working constitutional democracy. [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 6:13 am
I don't like thinking about either of these men's bodies, but now I know Musk is 6'1.5" and Zuckerberg is only 5'7". [read post]
