Search for: "MATTER OF B T B"
Results 9281 - 9300
of 19,429
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jun 2016, 5:34 am
” A defendant’s ability to assert this defense in a motion is established by Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.Getting back to the opinion, the judge began his analysis of the defendants’ Rule 12(b)(6) motion by explaining that in order tosurvive a motion to dismiss, a complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face. [read post]
24 Nov 2013, 3:35 pm
Isn’t this equally true of the civil system? [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm
Insofar as the European patent has not yet been granted (R 16(1)(b)) this third party may, no later than three months after the decision recognising its entitlement has become final (R 16(1)(a)), in respect of Contacting States designated in the EP application in which the decision has been taken or recognised or must be recognised on the basis of the Protocol on Recognition:(a) prosecute the EP application as its own application in place of the applicant (A 61(1)(a));(b) file a… [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 5:45 am
Otherwise, do you substantially agree with the facts as set forth by [the Government] in this matter? [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 1:41 pm
The court went on to explain that,`[t]o uphold a conviction for theft by unlawful taking, the Commonwealth must establish the accused “unlawfully takes, or exercises unlawful control over, movable property of another with intent to deprive him thereof. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 5:54 am
The only review was of suitability under section 202(1)(f) (as amended) and not, as indicated in Warsame, under section 202(1)(b) both as to the discharge of Lewisham's duty and the "reasonable to accept" issue. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 4:37 pm
In an earlier post on his D&O Discourse blog (here), Doug Greene of the Lane Powell firm argued that “as a practical matter, a claim under Item 303 doesn’t add much, if anything, to a plain vanilla claim alleging that a statement was misleading for omitting the same information. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 5:54 am
The only review was of suitability under section 202(1)(f) (as amended) and not, as indicated in Warsame, under section 202(1)(b) both as to the discharge of Lewisham's duty and the "reasonable to accept" issue. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 12:51 pm
See § 66–5–205(A)-(B); 66–5–205.1(A)-(B). [read post]
23 Aug 2007, 8:06 am
Most docs don't hesitate to cut off prescriptions to suspected abusers. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 9:05 am
Specifically, the court in Caley did not address whether the right to proceed collectively under the FLSA may be waived as a matter of federal law. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 4:17 pm
" "Matter of public concern" includes an issue related to: (A) health or safety; (B) environmental, economic, or community well-being; (C) the government; (D) a public official or public figure; or (E) a good, product, or service in the marketplace. [read post]
30 Mar 2007, 11:37 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Andrew T. [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 9:25 am
Here is a case that both demonstrates the dysfunction of U.S. patent law with respect to eligible subject matter under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 6:45 am
Key Findings The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act created the Opportunity Zones program to spur investment in economically distressed census tracts. [read post]
25 Jan 2009, 1:17 pm
This matter concerns date on which the transfer penalty should start for Petitioners. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 12:08 pm
And to be sure, Fearless characterizes its contest as reflecting its "commitment" to the "[b]lack women-owned" business community. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 6:56 am
Baskin made various allegations about McQueen in the vlog and on the Big Cat Rescue site; McQueen sued, and the court held the case could go forward, because Baskin's claims made factual allegations that, if false (a matter for the jury), could be defamatory. [read post]
Users will have to deal with uncertainty about post Brexit participation UK in Unitary Patent system
2 Dec 2016, 5:47 am
If it doesn’t, what will happen to Unitary Patents that up to the Brexit were valid in the UK? [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 4:17 am
” At Reason’s Volokh Conspiracy blog, Randy Barnett adds that “[w]hat will matter a great deal to me is that he affirms at his hearings–readily and without apology–that he is a public meaning originalist. [read post]
