Search for: "Sales v. State"
Results 9281 - 9300
of 21,158
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2015, 6:01 am
Courts and regulators provided some clarification (in Microsoft v. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 4:49 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 7:24 pm
In 1969, Timothy Leary challenged his arrest for possession of marijuana under the Act; the case of Leary v. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 5:04 am
Steele v. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 4:38 am
Cascade Yarns, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 3:30 am
Corp. v State of New York, 14 AD3d 817,818 [3d Dept 2005]). [read post]
19 Apr 2015, 6:03 pm
These inconsistencies were enough to call the employer’s stated rationale into question. [read post]
19 Apr 2015, 5:53 pm
Then on April 1, 2013, the EEOC provided an interrogatory response to Cintas stating, in pertinent part, that “the class on whose behalf the Commission seeks monetary relief in this case is composed of females who applied at one of Defendant’s facilities in Michigan from 1999 to at least April 1, 2005 and were not hired to be a Route Sales Driver/Service Sales Representative. [read post]
18 Apr 2015, 1:55 pm
., Plaintiff, v. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 4:23 pm
Kelly v. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 11:05 am
Finally, Part V of this article concludes that, while it is unlikely that the Green Bay Packers will be joined by any other major league teams with public shareholders, the adoption of minor amendments to the JOBS Act and to state law could facilitate the use of crowdfunding in ways that lead to the increased public ownership of sports teams in the minor leagues or in newly created professional sports leagues. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 5:42 am
Mattocks v. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 5:00 am
Apr. 8, 2015), and Kraft v. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 2:31 pm
It has been consistently recognized by the courts of this State that there is an overriding need of a custodial parent and children to occupy and remain in the marital residence, which needs outweighs the non-custodial Page 26 parent's desire to receive any immediate proceeds from its sale (see Nissen v. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 8:36 am
The 2005, Dallas Court of Appeals case, Hoffman v. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 5:26 am
The latest win is in In re Actiq Sales & Marketing Practices Litigation, ___ F.R.D. ___, 2015 WL 1312015 (E.D. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 11:15 am
., Plaintiff, v. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 9:20 am
. * Martin v. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 6:44 am
In Lexmark v. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 6:42 am
Clark v. [read post]
