Search for: "State v. Word"
Results 9281 - 9300
of 40,668
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Oct 2019, 10:58 am
Huawei/Conversant v. [read post]
26 Oct 2019, 9:27 am
Case citation: Wexler v. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 7:42 pm
From A.M. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 10:00 am
United States, 485 F.2d 1087, 1097 (8th Cir. 1973) (voiding as vague statute punishing "libelous, scurrilous, defamatory words" written on the outside of an envelope"). [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 7:00 am
OGD Equipment Co. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 1:46 pm
PeaceHealth v. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 10:40 am
” Perez v. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 10:17 am
See United States v. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 9:52 am
As the Supreme Court made clear in Nixon v. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 9:19 am
The particular example considered was the disclaimer, “registration does not give an exclusive right over the word RoslagsPunsch” in a figurative mark containing that word. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 9:10 am
Again, this has led to different rules per EU Member States, a scenario that the Regulation will ideally resolve. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 9:10 am
Again, this has led to different rules per EU Member States, a scenario that the Regulation will ideally resolve. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 4:00 am
"Commenting that the Charter Schools Act consistently uses the word "operation" to refer to the practical administration, management and supervision of individual charter schools, the Appellate Division concluded that the inclusion of the word "operation" in Education Law §355(2-a) does not authorize the Committee to promulgate regulations pertaining to teacher licensure and certification. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 4:00 am
Driedger’s modern principle[1] is often referred to as it was stated in Re Rizzo & Rizzo Shoes Ltd, [1998] 1 SCR 27 at para 21: “Today there is only one principle or approach, namely, the words of the Act are to be read in their entire context, and in their grammatical and ordinary sense harmoniously with the scheme of the Act, the object of the Act, and the intention of Parliament. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 4:00 am
"Commenting that the Charter Schools Act consistently uses the word "operation" to refer to the practical administration, management and supervision of individual charter schools, the Appellate Division concluded that the inclusion of the word "operation" in Education Law §355(2-a) does not authorize the Committee to promulgate regulations pertaining to teacher licensure and certification. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 11:40 pm
Supreme Court’s Obergefell v. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm
J. 131 (2013) in King v. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 11:57 am
In the past, many have observed anecdotally and cynically that even after many years of deliberation and millions of dollars in legal and expert fees often expended, the tariff at the end of the day has often the simple arithmetical average of the amounts proposed by the proponent and opponent(s) +/– a few percent.However, that pattern, if it was ever true, has been changing and the Board has issued some surprising and encouraging decision. in recent yearsThe Board has refused to set… [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 11:43 am
Dureska explained that consumers would focus on the dominant portion of the trademark, which is the highly stylistic design prominently displayed above the smaller words VICTORY INTEGRATED PERFORMANCE, and which included large gold letters V and P along with a design reminiscent of Leonardo da Vinci’s Vitruvian Man. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 8:15 am
In Illinois v. [read post]