Search for: "Superior Court of California"
Results 9281 - 9300
of 10,172
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2008, 6:00 am
U-Haul Company of California (2006) 145 Cal.App.4th 1243 (Not Citableâ€â [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 6:00 am
California courts, however, have recognized that whether a business practice is deceptive will usually be a question of fact not appropriate for decision on demurrer. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 3:18 pm
Alameda County Superior Court Judge Larry Goodman told jurors they could acquit the developer of the ReiserFS filesysem or find him guilty of first-degree murder, second-degree murder, or voluntary manslaughter. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 12:54 pm
Reiser, quiet," Alameda County Superior Court Judge Larry Goodman declared after the defendant's short outburst. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 11:23 am
For ease of use, clients can contact the State Bar of California or the San Diego Superior Court Clerk's Office. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 10:17 am
First, it ignores all of the recent lessons of why panel data analysis is a superior method for estimating causal influence than a simple cross section analysis. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 4:00 pm
Superior Court, supra, 34 Cal. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 3:43 am
The lawsuit, filed in Los Angeles Superior Court in August 2007, was thrown out last November but reinstated in January. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:00 pm
In an example of the type of protection California's laws attempt to provide consumers from unfair and deceptive business practices, a Santa Cruz County Superior Court judge ruled that U-Haul engaged in "unlawful and fraudulent business practices" when they advised agents to book reservations of trucks and trailers without knowing if it will have the equipment available when and where customers need it. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 1:30 pm
The lawsuit, filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of California, alleges infringement of four Seagate patents. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 5:00 pm
Superior Court (1985) 39 Cal.3d 740, in which the California Supreme Court called the contingent fee agreement between a city government and a private attorney in a lawsuit against an adult bookstore "inappropriate under the circumstances. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 4:06 pm
I'm talking about how, when you call superior court judges in some Bay Area courtrooms, you get a person on the other end of the line answering in ridiculously hushed tones. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 9:10 pm
Supreme Court has agreed to take up the issue in a Kansas case.In the California case, the 1st District Court of Appeal court reversed a Superior Court decision that held the SVP law unconstitutional. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 4:10 pm
Superior Court of Santa Clara County, the Court of Appeals for the Sixth District upheld a trial court discovery order protecting specified documents from disclosure on the ground that discovery would violate the common law mental processes principle which precludes judicial inquiry into the motivation or mental processes of legislators in enacting legislation. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 12:31 pm
Jurors took notes and appeared engaged as Hora summarized a case that began Nov. 6 here in Alameda County Superior Court and saw some 60 witnesses. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 4:20 pm
" Alameda County Superior Court Judge Larry Goodman asked. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 3:11 am
"I suppose that could happen," said Stanislaus County Deputy District Attorney Nate Baker, who will argue Calhoun's case before three judges from the 5th District Court of Appeal in Fresno.The issue revolves around procedure, not pedophilia.Jessica's law, which was approved by California voters in November 2006, is best known for provisions that keep registered sex offenders from living within 2,000 feet of a school or park. [read post]
13 Apr 2008, 9:02 am
From the outset, grand jurors were so worried about leaks from the secret proceedings that they convened at the federal courthouse in Santa Ana because the nearby Superior Court is served by sheriff's bailiffs. [read post]
13 Apr 2008, 5:02 am
The Contra Costa County Superior Court originally found in favor of the City of Antioch. [read post]
9 Apr 2008, 3:30 pm
Therefore, the superior court's order is unjustified, and we will direct the court to set it aside.Id. at 16 (footnote omitted). [read post]
