Search for: "United States v. Close" Results 9281 - 9300 of 14,201
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
” The court rejected defendants’ argument that dismissal was warranted because Moments had consumptive uses which, under United Housing Foundation, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 2:20 pm by Lyle Denniston
Commentary Eighteen months ago, the Supreme Court decided Boumediene v. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 8:52 am by Timothy P. Flynn, Esq.
 Court watchers equate the Perry case to that of Brown v Board of Education (abolishing the "separate but equal" fallacy in public schools) and Loving v Virginia (holding that a state could not prohibit interracial marriages).Whatever the outcome of the trial, an intermediate appeal to the Ninth Circuit is guaranteed to send this one to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 12:03 pm by Michael Zischke
  Mitigated negative declaration on conversion of apartments to hotel upheld against claim of impact based on loss of rent-stabilized units; baseline did not include any such units. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 5:58 pm
In fact little or no justification is offered by the Commission for this conclusion.Kerkhoven again arose for consideration, however, within the context of X, Y & Z v United Kingdom (1997). [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 5:00 pm by Stephen Wermiel
The doctrine is derived from Article I of the Constitution, which says that, “All legislative powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States. . . . [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 7:48 am
Supreme Court - United States - Law - Government - Supreme Court of the United States [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 5:48 am
The CJEU ruling is out: Internetportal und Marketing GmbH v Richard Schlicht (Domain Name / Nom de Domaine!) [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 3:44 am by Peter Mahler
The case pits the sponsor, Katherine Chou, and her family members, all of whom also own units in the building, against a group of unrelated unit owners who sued primarily to enforce the offering plan and bylaws requiring the sponsor to relinquish control of the six-member board the earlier of five years after the first closing or after the closing of title of 75% of the units, and also prohibiting the sponsor from casting her votes to elect a board… [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 5:02 am by Brian A. Comer
“After the judge makes a determination as to damages, we will consider our options,” Panico said in his statement.The case is State of South Carolina v. [read post]