Search for: "United States v. Close"
Results 9281 - 9300
of 14,201
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Sep 2012, 5:24 am
Citing . . . the 4th Amendment to the United States Constitution, [Contreras] essentially argues that because the warrant for Ashley's phone contained errors, it was invalid; and without a valid warrant, the seizure of the phone was unreasonable under the 4th Amendment. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 5:12 am
Nevada)Arbitrator orders effects bargaining for prison closure; Judge issues TROAccording to AFSCME Council 31, a judge has issued a temporary restraining order preventing the State of Illinois from closing certain state prisons. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 4:23 am
In Sahin v Turkey (2007) 44 EHRR 5 the Court assumed that the applicant? [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 4:08 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 10:38 am
Department of Justice (DOJ), who stressed Samsung's importance and said he "hope[s] Samsung Electronics can sell its products in the United States despite the [recent California jury] verdict".The governments of the United States and South Korea are traditional close allies. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 7:05 am
United States, 110 F.3d 780 (Fed. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 7:05 am
United States, 110 F.3d 780 (Fed. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 5:34 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 11:10 am
Sadly, the United States also experimented with government-imposed racial labeling. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 8:26 am
Board of State Canvassers, the court granted Defend Michigan Democracy and Taxpayers United Michigan Foundation leave to intervene. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 7:45 am
Itasca County defeats (19) United States v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 7:10 am
See Bunney v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 1:46 am
Shum v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 8:26 am
One short year after publication, in 2010, Anti-Corruption Principle was relied upon by Justice Stevens in his Citizens United v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 7:59 am
He appealed, and in United States v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 7:09 am
It was for the legislature to change the law and the established practise of the USPTO (United States Patent and Trademark Office) if it wished to treat isolated DNA differently from other compositions of matter to account for its perceived special function. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 6:43 am
United States, 196 U.S. 375 (1905), an attempt to monopolize under Section 2 has been closely analogized to the criminal law of attempt. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 3:00 am
In Lennar Homes, LLC, et al. v. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 6:13 pm
One of the most closely watched CAAF cases in recent years has been United States v. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 5:39 am
As the opinion notes, Reynolds Williams filed [this] action against United States of America (“United States”) alleging that the federal Transportation Security Administration (`TSA’) lost or stole certain electronic devices and accessories. [read post]
