Search for: "Doe 35"
Results 9301 - 9320
of 17,232
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 May 2008, 10:21 pm
" Research does not support these myths, but there is research to suggest that such policies may ultimately be counterproductive. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 9:03 am
The case is simply one of statutory interpretation as to the meaning and intent of Congress in enacting 35 U.S.C. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 10:19 am
The respondent does not dispute that the dismissal of the filiation proceeding is not final until the appeal is decided and that new evidence may be considered on appeal. [read post]
1 Jul 2018, 6:43 pm
How does this arise? [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 6:51 am
And let them note that in the act of doing so, they have furnished Bishop Bennison with the means to hide behind Psalm 35, verse 26:May those who want to harm me be totally embarrassed and ashamed! [read post]
23 May 2008, 11:22 am
I will tell you that our firm often does more legal work for people that don’t ask for advice ahead of time than do. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 5:09 pm
I’m skeptical about this conclusion, for reasons I mentioned at pp. 1534-35 of my Implementing the Right to Keep and Bear Arms, though I agree that the matter is close. [read post]
31 Oct 2021, 11:17 am
On p. 35, the authors turn to U.S. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 1:01 pm
Just because an applicant is qualified for diversion does not mean that the applicant is entitled to diversion. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 12:41 pm
In 2000, Doe was convicted of child exploitation. [read post]
25 May 2017, 9:30 pm
This ruling does not affect existing registration requirements for commercial operators. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 9:11 am
These briefs agree that such claims are patent eligible under current law, and should continue to meet the threshold of 35 U.S.C. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 6:50 pm
If no economist is qualified to do so, how does any economist know that no economist is? [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 4:32 am
Then under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 11:55 am
CFIUS conducted an investigation with respect to 35 of the 93 notices filed in 2010. [read post]
15 Aug 2007, 5:49 pm
PharmaStem did not argue before the district court, and does not argue here, that liability could be premised on a theory of "joint" or "divided" infringement, even in the absence of a finding of contributory infringement under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
15 Feb 2015, 12:58 pm
The patent statute requires that the claims “particularly point[] out and distinctly claim[] the subject matter” that the applicant regards as the invention. 35 U.S.C. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 9:28 am
Pursuant to Article 35 of the Export Regulations, items falling under Article 16 of the Trade Law can be restricted through export quotas and export licenses. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 1:18 pm
" 35 U.S.C. [read post]
9 Dec 2006, 7:26 am
Does this make sense? [read post]
