Search for: "In re: Justice v." Results 9301 - 9320 of 18,118
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jan 2015, 11:49 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Texas consisted of Justice Terry Jennings and former Justice Jim Sharp, who lost a reelection bid in November 2014. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 4:32 am by SHG
  That’s exactly the game they’re playing. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 3:28 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Take Our Poll#2 Justice Sotomayor v. #10 Tribal In-House Counsel Association Justice Sotomayor wins out in the people bracket, narrowly eliminating Judge Humetewa with 54 percent of the vote. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 3:28 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Take Our Poll#2 Justice Sotomayor v. #10 Tribal In-House Counsel Association Justice Sotomayor wins out in the people bracket, narrowly eliminating Judge Humetewa with 54 percent of the vote. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 2:54 am by Amy Howe
” At PrawfsBlawg, Richard Re looks at last week’s reargument order in the Armed Career Criminal Act case Johnson v. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 11:09 am by Lyle Denniston
”  He told Cortman bluntly: “You’re forcing us into making a very wooden distinction. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 3:45 am
"One of the most recent cases at the level of the Court of Justice of the European Union involving an interpretation of Article 5(3)(d) of the InfoSoc Directive was Painer [here]. [read post]
11 Jan 2015, 4:00 am by Administrator
SOQUIJ is attached to the Québec Department of Justice and collects, analyzes, enriches, and disseminates legal information in Québec. [read post]
10 Jan 2015, 4:46 am by Lyle Denniston
That notion dates all the way back to a Supreme Court decision in 1890 in the case of In re Burrus. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 1:05 pm by Sandy Levinson
 But what about the notion that "a majority of justices might still rule that lawmakers' language compels a negative result. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 10:00 pm by Doug Austin
Sometimes requests for sanctions are granted, sometimes they’re not. [read post]