Search for: "Matter of Mark T."
Results 9301 - 9320
of 16,587
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Aug 2013, 6:18 am
The court here drew on Judge Leval’s 1990 article defining transformative use as a use that is productive and employs the “quoted matter” in a different manner or for a different purpose than the original. [read post]
10 Aug 2013, 5:19 am
If your situation doesn’t qualify for legal action, that doesn’t mean you can’t take action. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 7:13 am
You can tell what her perspective on the protection of well-known marks is, so I won’t detail it. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 4:00 am
” Justice Bellatoni directed that that the matter be heard before a different Hearing Officer. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 3:55 am
Here the complainant had earlier common law rights to the mark DESIGN FIRST for construction-related services, while the registrant had adopted the mark DESIGN 1st /FIRST for various product design services. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 5:17 pm
Martinez at the Supreme Court, a case that’s proven to be the high water mark of prisoners’ rights. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 3:01 pm
Mark McKenna and Katherine Strandburg, Progress and Competition in Design Commentator: Shubha Ghosh Trying to explain works where function and aesthetics are integrated. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 9:36 am
It matters both because of the idea of personality and the idea of effort: if you bite, you’re appropriating the effort of another to get to the point where their style is recognizable. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm
It is true that none of the devices shown in the figures of document D14 is marked as “figure 9”. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 10:43 am
” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 10:06 am
Not that vodka isn’t very important… but you know what I mean. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 10:06 am
Not that vodka isn’t very important… but you know what I mean. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 6:00 am
So why doesn’t the lack of vowels matter or somehow make the marks distinguishable? [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 5:27 am
That doesn’t matter. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 12:35 pm
Adding protections for “national, cultural and religious” terms just makes matters worse. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 9:37 am
The attorneys contend that "[i]t is not appropriate for consideration and - even at this late hour - the allegations the Government 'would have' or 'could have' made remain short of the mark." [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 9:19 am
(New York tends to be more complicated in many legal matters, unfortunately.) [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 8:39 am
Also, police officers’ identities and conduct on the job are matters “with which the public has a right to concern itself. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 4:32 am
It didn’t matter that he was just one of many players in the game. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 7:21 pm
” Id. at 7 (internal citations and quotation marks omitted). [read post]
