Search for: "Plaintiff(s)" Results 9301 - 9320 of 178,514
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jan 2011, 1:37 am
Lamb and his plaintiff diocese filed a separate lawsuit against St. [read post]
24 Dec 2019, 4:30 pm by DeFrancisco & Falgiatano
Here, the plaintiffs motion arose out of the trial court’s ruling regarding the admission of evidence regarding the defendant’s standard practices and procedures. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 9:09 am by Doyle, Barlow & Mazard PLLC
  The Northern District’s opinion stated that “[t]he argument misses the point of plaintiffs alleged injury: Plaintiff alleges she suffered depressed wages. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 2:48 pm
Plaintiff and defendant then bought out the nonparty's one-third interest in SAR, giving plaintiff and defendant each a 50% interest in it. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 5:30 am by Daniel E. Cummins
   According to the Opinion, this matter involved a medical malpractice action in which the Plaintiff alleged that the Defendant doctor damaged the female Plaintiffs ureter during surgery, which gradually led to permanent damage to the Plaintiffs left kidney such that the kidney had to be surgically removed four (4) years after the original alleged negligence. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 5:57 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The investigator also thought that plaintiff had forged his brother's name on the new account documents. [read post]
16 Mar 2021, 5:40 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Plaintiff may have a prima facie, or preliminary, case of retaliation, but he cannot prove that management's reason for the promotion denial are false. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 12:00 am by Sydney Boyle
For the above reasons, the court affirmed the lower court’s dismissal of the complaint, holding that Plaintiff failed to state a claim. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Plaintiff did not present any evidence that contradicted the Superintendent's testimony that he believed that Plaintiff was attempting to bypass the school’s security policy when he confronted her on the morning of the incident nor did Plaintiff ever argued that the initial restriction announced in the letter sent to her was "viewpoint-based. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Plaintiff did not present any evidence that contradicted the Superintendent's testimony that he believed that Plaintiff was attempting to bypass the school’s security policy when he confronted her on the morning of the incident nor did Plaintiff ever argued that the initial restriction announced in the letter sent to her was "viewpoint-based. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 2:32 pm by Eugene Volokh
Plaintiffs sued, asking for an injunction against this behavior, on the theory that it violated the plaintiffs’ “right of publicity” — the right to block (some) uses of plaintiffs name or likeness for commercial purposes. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 5:24 pm
A divided three-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit ruled last Friday that plaintiff Abdullah al-Kidd pleaded sufficiently specific facts to withstand former AG John Ashcroft's motion to dismiss his case for unlawfully using the federal material witness statute, 18 U.S.C.... [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
No such authorization for an attorney’s fee award was found in this case.The court did otherwise note that the Plaintiff was entitled to pursue delay damages under Pa. [read post]
23 Mar 2021, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
University of Iowa, (8th Circuit, March 22, 2021), the U.S. 8th Circuit Court of Appeals held that the district court erred in granting qualified immunity to the individual defendants on plaintiff's free speech and expressive association claims. [read post]
3 Dec 2021, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
Oklahoma's Attorney General and its Governor, along with 16 Oklahoma Air National Guard members, have sued to invalidate President Biden's Executive Order requiring COVID-19 vaccination for all federal employees. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Abbott,  (WD TX, filed 2/25/2016), contends:Defendants have violated the Plaintiffs Free Speech, Equal Protection and Due Process rights, and ... have violated the Establishment Clause, by removing and excluding the Plaintiffs protected speech, a display, from a public forum, because of the content of the Plaintiffs speech.FFRF issued a press release announcing the filing of the lawsuit. [read post]