Search for: "Sales v. State"
Results 9301 - 9320
of 21,158
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2015, 5:07 am
Yesterday, just a week after oral argument, the 3rd Circuit overturned the district court in the much-awaited Trinity Wall Street v. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 12:40 am
Judge Kozinski went further and distinguished between the likelihood of confusion produced by the functional copying of trade marks on the basis of whether it was undertaken at the point of sale or post-sale. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 9:58 pm
Co. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 8:34 pm
Apotex Inc. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 8:34 pm
Apotex Inc. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 3:11 am
For the Appellate Division, the fact that Svenson had made a profit from the sale of the photographs does not render the use of the photographs commercial, citing the Stephano v. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 2:16 am
The sales audit shows that it sold an average of 1,858,067 copies in March, an improvement on the month of February. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 12:56 pm
(Citibank was not required to produce a written agreement to recover on account-stated theory) -- CONTRA -- Tully v. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 12:41 pm
As of December 2013, Schutte Inc. hadn’t designed, manufactured, or offered any products for sale in the United States. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 12:06 pm
The Court affirmed that the photographs' publication, sale and use could not be impeded. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 7:24 am
" Thought, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 7:12 am
Granting the motion, the court noted that the language of the IMWL states that it applies to “places of employment in the State of Illinois” and was intended to relieve “burdens of the State” and “an unnecessary burden on taxpayers in the State. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 6:01 am
The defendants sought to dismiss the Exchange Act claims under an interpretation of the Supreme Court’s Morrison decision that would require, for the U.S. securities laws to apply, that the plaintiff establish that the transaction occurred on a domestic exchange, that title to the security was transferred in the United States, or that irrevocable liability was incurred in the United States. [read post]
11 Apr 2015, 9:59 am
” * Sacchi v. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 4:26 pm
” Mary Kay, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 12:18 pm
Additional Resources: Adams v. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 8:21 am
FTC v. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 6:35 am
The recent case of Towe v. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 4:54 am
Nola Spice Designs, LLC v. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 2:00 am
If petitioner’s California activities sufficed to allow adjudication of a Kansas-rooted case in California, "the same global reach would presumably be available in every other State in which [petitioner’s] sales are sizeable. [read post]
