Search for: "State of California v. United States"
Results 9301 - 9320
of 13,837
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Aug 2015, 3:28 pm
Anything less would be a violation of the United States' First Amendment. [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 10:28 am
The Florida Bar v. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 11:26 am
Like all federal cases, Perry started in a District Court, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in San Francisco. [read post]
2 May 2008, 12:15 pm
United States, No. 06-87L (Apr. 15, 2008), where the landowner sought compensation after the Fish and Wildlife Service designated property as critical habitat for the Mississippi Sandhill Crane. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 4:35 pm
Flickr user: drpavloff The US Supreme Court justices heard oral arguments on Tuesday morning in two companion cases revolving around whether police officers need a warrant to search a suspect's cell phone upon arrest: United States v. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 7:44 am
A recent United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit case discusses what a passenger should or should not expect to be warned about by the cruise line. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 5:41 am
Briefly: In Newsweek, Ian McDougall looks ahead at the issues in United States v. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 3:02 pm
Professor Karlan has also participated in extensive pro bono litigation, primarily before the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 3:40 pm
As a result, Las Americas must revamp its representation strategy and divert resources to preparing individuals who have a genuine fear to manifest such a fear before entering the United States, significantly limiting the number of clients it can serve. [read post]
7 Jan 2008, 1:22 am
United States v Arnold Decision (2006) In the NY Times story "Searching a computer", said Jennifer M. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 6:28 am
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)Pity the docket and courtroom clerks at the United States District Court for the Central District of California, who are trying not to confuse separate Barry Diller and BarryDriller lawsuits.A little more than a week after a copyright and trademark infringement suit, Fox Television Services, Inc. et al. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 6:00 am
In Davis v. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 3:56 pm
In Perry v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 9:00 pm
None of that, though, was obscene under Virginia's statutory definition nor under the United States Supreme Court's obscenity definition in Miller v. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 6:28 am
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)Pity the docket and courtroom clerks at the United States District Court for the Central District of California, who are trying not to confuse separate Barry Diller and BarryDriller lawsuits.A little more than a week after a copyright and trademark infringement suit, Fox Television Services, Inc. et al. v. [read post]
26 Aug 2006, 7:31 am
As far as this past week, there appears to be numerous losses from the larger including multiple losses from the California Supreme Court.The Third Circuit earlier in the week in Jones v. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 4:39 am
"I think that fairly summarizes why the carrier feels it is prejudiced in this case.The case is Nu Square Corp. v. [read post]
23 May 2016, 5:01 am
He was admitted to the California bar in 2014, and also was admitted to practice before the United States Tax Court. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 10:22 am
In United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 4:33 am
The thought behind this was that if the parties could not agree which medical professional was going to govern the case then the government would decide, thus cutting down on litigation, ergo costs, and resulting in less dispute.The theory didn't translate into practice and one of the more common complaints I hear as I travel the state is that the QME process a) doesn't work as intended, b) is not timely, c) doesn't have enough physicians who know what they're doing, and… [read post]
