Search for: "State v. House"
Results 9301 - 9320
of 28,796
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2021, 2:00 am
The Act adopts and incorporates an affirmative defense to hostile work environment claims that was recognized by the United States Supreme Court in Faragher v. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 2:00 am
The Act adopts and incorporates an affirmative defense to hostile work environment claims that was recognized by the United States Supreme Court in Faragher v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 2:26 pm
He noted that s.118, was as follows: (1) A secure tenant has the right to buy, that is to say, in the circumstances and subject to the conditions and exceptions stated in the following provisions of this Part - … (b) if the landlord does not own the freehold, or if the dwelling-house is a flat (whether or not the landlord owns the freehold), to be granted a lease of the dwelling-house. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 2:26 pm
He noted that s.118, was as follows: (1) A secure tenant has the right to buy, that is to say, in the circumstances and subject to the conditions and exceptions stated in the following provisions of this Part - … (b) if the landlord does not own the freehold, or if the dwelling-house is a flat (whether or not the landlord owns the freehold), to be granted a lease of the dwelling-house. [read post]
10 May 2021, 4:21 am
In Rivas v. [read post]
5 Mar 2021, 12:45 pm
In United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 6:57 am
Among the many provision in the Act is language to overrule the Supreme Court’s decision in Epic Systems Corp v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am
Pinnock v Manchester City Council [2010] UKSC 45 (Supreme Court pdf & BAILII links) Whenever a battle weary group of housing lawyers gets together, conversation inevitably turns (after the routine complaints about the less congenial DJs) to the thorny issue of which is the most important housing law case of all. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am
Pinnock v Manchester City Council [2010] UKSC 45 (Supreme Court pdf & BAILII links) Whenever a battle weary group of housing lawyers gets together, conversation inevitably turns (after the routine complaints about the less congenial DJs) to the thorny issue of which is the most important housing law case of all. [read post]
[Josh Blackman] The PROMESA Board Members Are Not "Officers of the United States." So What Are They?
10 Jun 2020, 11:31 am
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] Recently, the Supreme Court decided Financial Oversight and Management Bd. for Puerto Rico v. [read post]
10 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
U.S. v. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 9:30 pm
A notice of Saul Cornell’s research in advance of the oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
9 Apr 2021, 12:48 pm
Islam v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 2:55 pm
Div. 2006) (stating “a parent cannot bargain away a child’s right to support because the right to support belongs to the child, not the parent”); Patetta v. [read post]
22 Mar 2006, 5:21 am
In United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 9:25 pm
In Taumoepeau v. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 9:21 am
Haldeman v. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 1:18 pm
The case is Chanel Inc. v. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 11:53 am
(Exemption No. 7: "Actions taken by regulatory agencies as authorized by state law or local ordinance to assure the maintenance, restoration, or enhancement of a natural resource where the regulatory process involves procedures for protection of the environment. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm
Late last week, in Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives v. [read post]
