Search for: "State v. Word"
Results 9301 - 9320
of 40,668
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2019, 4:45 am
There was never any serious question that the prosecution would be prohibited under RAV v. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 1:14 am
In the latest bad faith case, Koton Mağazacilik Tekstil Sanayi ve Ticaret AŞ v. [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm
Under Addington v. [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 11:06 am
It is time for the United States to stop debating whether to address it, and start talking about how to address it. [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 9:00 am
Some states have an exception, whereby they allow healthcare clinicians from different professions to be housed together as shareholders within the same professional corporation. [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 3:49 am
” It contended that CIELA thus “provoke[s] consumers to associate the registered mark with ‘cielo’ and the beauty and purety [sic] of [Montana] the Big Sky State,” where Registrant is located. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 12:41 pm
Richard V. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 10:17 am
See also State v. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 5:35 am
These are not empty words; at least sometimes they signal the true intent of the administration to withhold the required information from Congress. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 4:00 am
., Local 1000, AFSCME AFL-CIO v New York State Off. of Children & Family Servs., 174 AD3d 1206 [CSEA] and, similarly, in Ayers v City of Mount Vernon, Appellate Division, Second Department, 2019 NY Slip Op 07230 [Ayers], it appears that there some misunderstanding or misapplication of the words of art "permanent appointment" and "tenure" in determining the employment status of a public employee while he or she is serving a… [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 4:00 am
., Local 1000, AFSCME AFL-CIO v New York State Off. of Children & Family Servs., 174 AD3d 1206 [CSEA] and, similarly, in Ayers v City of Mount Vernon, Appellate Division, Second Department, 2019 NY Slip Op 07230 [Ayers], it appears that there some misunderstanding or misapplication of the words of art "permanent appointment" and "tenure" in determining the employment status of a public employee while he or she is serving a… [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 1:34 am
” In a welcome development, the CA backed the approach of Laddie J (“a judge with prolific expertise in the law of copyright”) in Cala Homes v Alfred McAlpine [1995] FSR 818 at p.835 over the narrower one of Lightman J in Robin Ray v Classic FM [1998] FSR 622 at [27]-[28]. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 12:14 am
In a word: no. [read post]
20 Oct 2019, 1:27 pm
The first appellant also stated on the form “The current tenant is the first tenant I have rented the property to”. [read post]
20 Oct 2019, 1:59 am
As readers know, this is a profoundly un-harmonized area of the law, and different approaches are in place across different EU Member States. [read post]
19 Oct 2019, 9:37 am
KGAA v. [read post]
19 Oct 2019, 8:30 am
Phillips v. [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 7:21 am
In AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 6:30 am
I argued then, and believe now, that the Second Amendment, properly understood, has little to do with “self-defense” in the sense adopted by Justice Scalia in Heller and everything to do with a civic republican conception of a virtuous populace willing and able to— in the words of Lin-Manuel Miranda—“rise up” against an arguably tyrannical state. [read post]
